John Paul Minda

3.5k total citations
49 papers, 2.0k citations indexed

About

John Paul Minda is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience and Family Practice. According to data from OpenAlex, John Paul Minda has authored 49 papers receiving a total of 2.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 30 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 11 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 7 papers in Family Practice. Recurrent topics in John Paul Minda's work include Child and Animal Learning Development (26 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (7 papers) and Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (7 papers). John Paul Minda is often cited by papers focused on Child and Animal Learning Development (26 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (7 papers) and Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (7 papers). John Paul Minda collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and Germany. John Paul Minda's co-authors include J. David Smith, J. David Smith, Rahel Rabi, David J. Smith, Sarah Miles, David A. Washburn, Mark Goldszmidt, Barbara A. Church, Amy S. Desroches and Julie J. Carswell and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Psychological Science and Neuropsychologia.

In The Last Decade

John Paul Minda

49 papers receiving 1.9k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
John Paul Minda Canada 23 1.2k 684 539 456 313 49 2.0k
Elizabeth Bonawitz United States 23 1.6k 1.4× 488 0.7× 421 0.8× 404 0.9× 335 1.1× 94 2.5k
Larissa K. Samuelson United States 27 2.4k 2.0× 807 1.2× 548 1.0× 314 0.7× 190 0.6× 65 2.9k
Anna V. Fisher United States 22 1.1k 1.0× 469 0.7× 373 0.7× 149 0.3× 221 0.7× 94 1.7k
Moreno I. Coco United Kingdom 17 752 0.6× 873 1.3× 569 1.1× 409 0.9× 354 1.1× 52 2.0k
Robert Morrison United States 17 900 0.8× 665 1.0× 483 0.9× 285 0.6× 311 1.0× 82 2.0k
Joanne Arciuli Australia 29 1.8k 1.5× 1.5k 2.1× 569 1.1× 287 0.6× 297 0.9× 131 2.8k
Julián M. Pine United Kingdom 38 3.5k 3.0× 1.6k 2.4× 803 1.5× 830 1.8× 158 0.5× 130 4.7k
Katherine Demuth Australia 31 2.4k 2.0× 960 1.4× 1.8k 3.3× 686 1.5× 102 0.3× 186 3.8k
Koen Lamberts United Kingdom 23 499 0.4× 917 1.3× 325 0.6× 243 0.5× 348 1.1× 65 2.0k
Simon De Deyne Belgium 25 741 0.6× 1.2k 1.7× 580 1.1× 717 1.6× 358 1.1× 69 2.2k

Countries citing papers authored by John Paul Minda

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Paul Minda's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Paul Minda with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Paul Minda more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Paul Minda

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Paul Minda. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Paul Minda. The network helps show where John Paul Minda may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Paul Minda

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Paul Minda. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Paul Minda based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John Paul Minda. John Paul Minda is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Minda, John Paul, et al.. (2024). Single and multiple systems in categorization and category learning. Nature Reviews Psychology. 3(8). 536–551. 5 indexed citations
2.
Minda, John Paul, et al.. (2022). Psychedelic Experiences and Mindfulness are Associated with Improved Wellbeing. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs. 55(2). 123–133. 9 indexed citations
3.
Minda, John Paul, et al.. (2022). Reexamining the “brain drain” effect: A replication of Ward et al. (2017). Acta Psychologica. 230. 103717–103717. 8 indexed citations
4.
Minda, John Paul, et al.. (2021). An investigation of idiom processing advantage using translated familiar idioms.. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie expérimentale. 75(2). 162–168. 2 indexed citations
5.
6.
Rabi, Rahel, et al.. (2018). Cognitive changes in conjunctive rule-based category learning: An ERP approach. Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience. 18(5). 1034–1048. 9 indexed citations
7.
Rabi, Rahel & John Paul Minda. (2017). Familiarization may minimize age-related declines in rule-based category learning.. Psychology and Aging. 32(7). 654–674. 6 indexed citations
8.
Rabi, Rahel & John Paul Minda. (2016). Category learning in older adulthood: A study of the Shepard, Hovland, and Jenkins (1961) tasks.. Psychology and Aging. 31(2). 185–197. 12 indexed citations
9.
Rabi, Rahel & John Paul Minda. (2014). Perceptual Category Learning: Similarity and Differences Between Children and Adults. Cognitive Science. 36(36). 1 indexed citations
10.
Swartzman, Leora C., et al.. (2014). The Influence of Causal Knowledge on the Comprehension and Retention of Medical Information among Younger and Older Adults. Cognitive Science. 36(36). 1 indexed citations
11.
Miles, Sarah, Kazunaga Matsuki, & John Paul Minda. (2014). Continuous executive function disruption interferes with application of an information integration categorization strategy. Attention Perception & Psychophysics. 76(5). 1318–1334. 14 indexed citations
12.
Miles, Sarah & John Paul Minda. (2012). Perceptual fluency can be used as a cue for categorization decisions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 19(4). 737–742. 1 indexed citations
13.
Miles, Sarah & John Paul Minda. (2011). The effects of concurrent verbal and visual tasks on category learning.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 37(3). 588–607. 30 indexed citations
14.
Miles, Sarah & John Paul Minda. (2009). Learning new categories: Adults tend to use rules while children sometimes rely on family resemblance. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 31(31). 5 indexed citations
15.
Minda, John Paul, et al.. (2009). Categorizing Patients in a Forced-Choice Triad Task: The Integration of Context in Patient Management. PLoS ONE. 4(6). e5881–e5881. 3 indexed citations
16.
Minda, John Paul, Amy S. Desroches, & Barbara A. Church. (2008). Learning rule-described and non-rule-described categories: A comparison of children and adults.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 34(6). 1518–1533. 65 indexed citations
17.
Smith, J. David, John Paul Minda, & David A. Washburn. (2004). Category Learning in Rhesus Monkeys: A Study of the Shepard, Hovland, and Jenkins (1961) Tasks.. Journal of Experimental Psychology General. 133(3). 398–414. 78 indexed citations
18.
Minda, John Paul & J. David Smith. (2002). Comparing prototype-based and exemplar-based accounts of category learning and attentional allocation.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 28(2). 275–292. 80 indexed citations
19.
Minda, John Paul, et al.. (2001). Journey to the center of the category: The dissociation in amnesia between categorization and recognition.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 27(4). 984–1002. 46 indexed citations
20.
Smith, J. David & John Paul Minda. (2000). Thirty categorization results in search of a model.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 26(1). 3–27. 150 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Elizabeth Bonawitz Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Larissa K. Samuelson Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Anna V. Fisher Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Moreno I. Coco Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Robert Morrison Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Joanne Arciuli Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Julián M. Pine Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Katherine Demuth Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Koen Lamberts Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Simon De Deyne
Rankless by CCL
2026