Sarah Miles

787 total citations
17 papers, 352 citations indexed

About

Sarah Miles is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Pharmacology and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Sarah Miles has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 352 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 3 papers in Pharmacology and 3 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Sarah Miles's work include Child and Animal Learning Development (4 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (2 papers) and Anesthesia and Pain Management (2 papers). Sarah Miles is often cited by papers focused on Child and Animal Learning Development (4 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (2 papers) and Anesthesia and Pain Management (2 papers). Sarah Miles collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and United States. Sarah Miles's co-authors include John Paul Minda, Bridget Griffiths, Douglas J. Veale, Hilary Moss, Paul Emery, Paul Emery, Rahel Rabi, Susanna Proudman, Kazunaga Matsuki and Désirée van der Heijde and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition.

In The Last Decade

Sarah Miles

14 papers receiving 337 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Sarah Miles Canada 7 145 109 77 63 55 17 352
Francesca Dall’Ara Italy 16 323 2.2× 161 1.5× 25 0.3× 46 0.7× 109 2.0× 36 631
Jennifer Woodland Canada 8 126 0.9× 24 0.2× 30 0.4× 28 0.4× 31 0.6× 16 358
Carol K. Phebus United States 11 31 0.2× 23 0.2× 43 0.6× 34 0.5× 121 2.2× 14 374
Diana L. Franco United States 9 29 0.2× 22 0.2× 84 1.1× 59 0.9× 6 0.1× 19 407
Chun‐Yu Lin Taiwan 9 56 0.4× 39 0.4× 76 1.0× 39 0.6× 13 0.2× 23 329
Daniela Carvalho United States 13 21 0.1× 65 0.6× 58 0.8× 28 0.4× 11 0.2× 44 531
Amy Perrin Ross United States 12 61 0.4× 265 2.4× 28 0.4× 28 0.4× 33 0.6× 35 425
T. Carmoi France 7 14 0.1× 44 0.4× 28 0.4× 16 0.3× 21 0.4× 37 219
Erdal Diri United States 10 211 1.5× 19 0.2× 60 0.8× 47 0.7× 99 1.8× 13 551
R. Macdonell Australia 3 59 0.4× 252 2.3× 35 0.5× 43 0.7× 57 1.0× 5 389

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Miles

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Miles's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Miles with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Miles more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Miles

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Miles. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Miles. The network helps show where Sarah Miles may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah Miles

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah Miles. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah Miles based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah Miles. Sarah Miles is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
1.
Clarke, Hance, Miki Peer, Sarah Miles, & Mary‐Ann Fitzcharles. (2025). Managing Pain in Fibromyalgia: Current and Future Options. Drugs. 85(9). 1081–1092. 1 indexed citations
2.
Bartoszko, Justyna, Sarah Miles, S. M. Razaullah Ansari, et al.. (2024). Postoperative intravenous iron to treat iron-deficiency anaemia in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: a protocol for a pilot, multicentre, placebo-controlled randomized trial (the POAM trial). SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 11. 100303–100303. 1 indexed citations
3.
Pagé, M. Gabrielle, Vivek Rao, James S. Khan, et al.. (2024). A Prospective Cohort Study of Acute Pain and In-Hospital Opioid Consumption After Cardiac Surgery: Associations With Psychological and Medical Factors and Chronic Postsurgical Pain. Anesthesia & Analgesia. 138(6). 1192–1204. 6 indexed citations
4.
Miles, Sarah, Miki Peer, Karim S. Ladha, & Hance Clarke. (2024). Cannabinoids dosing for osteoarthritis. The Lancet Regional Health - Europe. 38. 100850–100850.
5.
Patel, Ronak, et al.. (2023). Characteristics and Perioperative Risk Factors for Persistent Pain after Breast Cancer Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 4(3). 301–316.
6.
Li, Michelle M., Sarah Miles, Jeannie Callum, et al.. (2023). Postoperative anemia in cardiac surgery patients: a narrative review. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d anesthésie. 71(3). 408–421. 5 indexed citations
7.
Ladha, Karim S., Sophie A. Kitchen, Sarah Miles, Hance Clarke, & Tara Gomes. (2022). Use of injections for chronic pain from 2010 to 2019 in Ontario, Canada. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d anesthésie. 70(1). 100–105.
8.
Russell, Cayley, Maria Neufeld, Pamela Sabioni, et al.. (2019). Assessing service and treatment needs and barriers of youth who use illicit and non-medical prescription drugs in Northern Ontario, Canada. PLoS ONE. 14(12). e0225548–e0225548. 24 indexed citations
9.
Rabi, Rahel, Sarah Miles, & John Paul Minda. (2015). Learning categories via rules and similarity: Comparing adults and children. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology. 131. 149–169. 19 indexed citations
10.
Miles, Sarah, Kazunaga Matsuki, & John Paul Minda. (2014). Continuous executive function disruption interferes with application of an information integration categorization strategy. Attention Perception & Psychophysics. 76(5). 1318–1334. 14 indexed citations
11.
Miles, Sarah & John Paul Minda. (2012). Perceptual fluency can be used as a cue for categorization decisions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 19(4). 737–742. 1 indexed citations
12.
Miles, Sarah & John Paul Minda. (2011). The effects of concurrent verbal and visual tasks on category learning.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 37(3). 588–607. 30 indexed citations
13.
Miles, Sarah. (2011). Winning the battle: A review of postnatal depression. British Journal of Midwifery. 19(4). 221–227. 3 indexed citations
14.
Griffiths, Bridget, Paul Emery, Vicky Ryan, et al.. (2010). The BILAG multi-centre open randomized controlled trial comparing ciclosporin vs azathioprine in patients with severe SLE. Lara D. Veeken. 49(4). 723–732. 49 indexed citations
15.
Miles, Sarah & John Paul Minda. (2009). Learning new categories: Adults tend to use rules while children sometimes rely on family resemblance. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 31(31). 5 indexed citations
16.
Griffiths, Bridget, et al.. (2002). Systemic sclerosis and interstitial lung disease: a pilot study using pulse intravenous methylprednisolone and cyclophosphamide to assess the effect on high resolution computed tomography scan and lung function.. PubMed. 29(11). 2371–8. 95 indexed citations
17.
Proudman, Susanna, Philip G. Conaghan, C. Richardson, et al.. (2000). Treatment of poor-prognosis early rheumatoid arthritis: A randomized study of treatment with methotrexate, cyclosporin A, and intraarticular corticosteroids compared with sulfasalazine alone. Arthritis & Rheumatism. 43(8). 1809–1819. 99 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026