John Milne

401 total citations
10 papers, 272 citations indexed

About

John Milne is a scholar working on Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Information Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, John Milne has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 272 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Education, 3 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 2 papers in Information Systems. Recurrent topics in John Milne's work include Higher Education Learning Practices (6 papers), Student Assessment and Feedback (6 papers) and Higher Education and Employability (3 papers). John Milne is often cited by papers focused on Higher Education Learning Practices (6 papers), Student Assessment and Feedback (6 papers) and Higher Education and Employability (3 papers). John Milne collaborates with scholars based in New Zealand and Lebanon. John Milne's co-authors include Gordon Suddaby, Lynn Jeffrey, Eva Heinrich and David Morrison and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education and Educational Technology & Society.

In The Last Decade

John Milne

10 papers receiving 226 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
John Milne New Zealand	8	233	65	60	50	17	10	272
Allison Powell United States	8	197 0.8×	54 0.8×	64 1.1×	56 1.1×	9 0.5×	14	267
David W. Denton United States	7	206 0.9×	68 1.0×	31 0.5×	86 1.7×	14 0.8×	20	279
Mücahit Öztürk Türkiye	8	204 0.9×	71 1.1×	101 1.7×	85 1.7×	22 1.3×	22	300
Norhasyimah Hamzah Malaysia	8	167 0.7×	87 1.3×	34 0.6×	46 0.9×	10 0.6×	38	237
Don Knezek United States	5	186 0.8×	116 1.8×	51 0.8×	39 0.8×	16 0.9×	10	261
Søren Hattesen Balle	2	242 1.0×	79 1.2×	95 1.6×	42 0.8×	8 0.5×	2	326
Aidah Abdul Karim Malaysia	10	196 0.8×	130 2.0×	31 0.5×	62 1.2×	7 0.4×	52	294
Nor Aziah Alias Malaysia	8	159 0.7×	93 1.4×	41 0.7×	57 1.1×	9 0.5×	26	241
Carolyn Plump United States	5	197 0.8×	93 1.4×	70 1.2×	154 3.1×	14 0.8×	9	293
Ela Akgün-Özbek Türkiye	2	190 0.8×	65 1.0×	163 2.7×	40 0.8×	6 0.4×	4	324

Countries citing papers authored by John Milne

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Milne's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Milne with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Milne more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Milne

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Milne. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Milne. The network helps show where John Milne may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Milne

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Milne. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Milne based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John Milne. John Milne is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Jeffrey, Lynn, et al.. (2014). Blended Learning: How Teachers Balance the Blend of Online and Classroom Components. Journal of Information Technology Education Research. 13. 121–140. 158 indexed citations

2.

Milne, John, et al.. (2012). Early identification of students at risk of failing. ASCILITE Publications. 657–661. 11 indexed citations

3.

Heinrich, Eva, et al.. (2012). Pathways for improving support for the electronic management and marking of assignments. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. 28(2). 13 indexed citations

4.

Heinrich, Eva & John Milne. (2012). Applying a framework to evaluate assignment marking software: a case study on Lightwork. Research in Learning Technology. 20(2). 16152–16152. 3 indexed citations

5.

Milne, John, et al.. (2010). Integrating E-portfolios: Guiding Questions and Experiences. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 14(1). 47–61. 2 indexed citations

6.

Heinrich, Eva, et al.. (2009). An Investigation into E-Tool Use for Formative Assignment Assessment--Status and Recommendations. Educational Technology & Society. 12(4). 176–192. 30 indexed citations

7.

Heinrich, Eva, et al.. (2008). Recommendations for the use of e‐tools for improvements around assignment marking quality. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 34(4). 469–479. 23 indexed citations

8.

Suddaby, Gordon & John Milne. (2008). Coordinated, collaborative and coherent. Campus-Wide Information Systems. 25(2). 114–122. 12 indexed citations

9.

Milne, John, Eva Heinrich, & David Morrison. (2008). Technological support for assignment assessment: A New Zealand higher education survey. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. 24(5). 12 indexed citations

10.

Heinrich, Eva, et al.. (2006). Literature review on the use of e-learning tools for formative essay-type assessment. 8 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact