John MacArthur

1.0k total citations
33 papers, 530 citations indexed

About

John MacArthur is a scholar working on Transportation, Automotive Engineering and Civil and Structural Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, John MacArthur has authored 33 papers receiving a total of 530 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Transportation, 15 papers in Automotive Engineering and 4 papers in Civil and Structural Engineering. Recurrent topics in John MacArthur's work include Urban Transport and Accessibility (22 papers), Transportation Planning and Optimization (12 papers) and Transportation and Mobility Innovations (10 papers). John MacArthur is often cited by papers focused on Urban Transport and Accessibility (22 papers), Transportation Planning and Optimization (12 papers) and Transportation and Mobility Innovations (10 papers). John MacArthur collaborates with scholars based in United States, Brazil and Canada. John MacArthur's co-authors include Jennifer Dill, Christopher Cherry, Jonathan X. Weinert, Ziwen Ling, Kelly J. Clifton, Nathan McNeil, Joseph Broach, Donald M. Truxillo, Luke R. Jones and Layla Mansfield and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Sustainability and Transportation Research Part A Policy and Practice.

In The Last Decade

John MacArthur

32 papers receiving 511 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
John MacArthur United States 11 400 231 97 72 57 33 530
Neil Thorpe United Kingdom 12 236 0.6× 144 0.6× 90 0.9× 34 0.5× 81 1.4× 42 451
Mahmudur Rahman Fatmi Canada 15 468 1.2× 168 0.7× 84 0.9× 34 0.5× 94 1.6× 68 685
Steven R. Gehrke United States 15 514 1.3× 272 1.2× 130 1.3× 37 0.5× 46 0.8× 36 621
Christos Karolemeas Greece 12 289 0.7× 148 0.6× 112 1.2× 58 0.8× 49 0.9× 26 448
Sabreena Anowar United States 15 500 1.3× 253 1.1× 151 1.6× 31 0.4× 124 2.2× 36 705
Ziwen Ling United States 10 247 0.6× 105 0.5× 72 0.7× 97 1.3× 138 2.4× 20 423
Suman Mitra United States 15 429 1.1× 342 1.5× 135 1.4× 76 1.1× 73 1.3× 52 639
M. Manoj India 15 382 1.0× 109 0.5× 120 1.2× 47 0.7× 66 1.2× 41 515
Martin Lee-Gosselin Canada 15 530 1.3× 265 1.1× 94 1.0× 29 0.4× 154 2.7× 51 730
João Filipe Teixeira Portugal 13 561 1.4× 186 0.8× 133 1.4× 18 0.3× 83 1.5× 16 677

Countries citing papers authored by John MacArthur

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John MacArthur's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John MacArthur with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John MacArthur more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John MacArthur

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John MacArthur. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John MacArthur. The network helps show where John MacArthur may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John MacArthur

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John MacArthur. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John MacArthur based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John MacArthur. John MacArthur is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Jones, Luke R., C. Bennett, John MacArthur, & Christopher Cherry. (2024). Consumer purchase response to e-bike incentives: Results from a nationwide stated preference study. Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment. 129. 104114–104114. 12 indexed citations
2.
Rose, William J., et al.. (2023). E-trikes for urban delivery: An empirical mixed-fleet simulation approach to assess city logistics sustainability. Sustainable Cities and Society. 96. 104641–104641. 8 indexed citations
3.
MacArthur, John, et al.. (2023). Homelessness: A Guide for Public Transportation. Transportation Research Board eBooks. 1 indexed citations
4.
Dill, Jennifer, et al.. (2022). Factors influencing bike share among underserved populations: Evidence from three U.S. cities. Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment. 112. 103471–103471. 21 indexed citations
5.
MacArthur, John, et al.. (2021). The Perspectives on E-scooters Use: A Longitudinal Approach to Understanding E-scooter Travel Behavior in Portland, Oregon. 1 indexed citations
6.
McNeil, Nathan, et al.. (2021). Evaluation of a Transportation Incentive Program for Affordable Housing Residents. Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 2675(8). 240–253. 3 indexed citations
7.
Miller, Harvey J., Kelly J. Clifton, Gulsah Akar, et al.. (2021). Urban Sustainability Observatories: Leveraging Urban Experimentation for Sustainability Science and Policy. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 6 indexed citations
8.
MacArthur, John, et al.. (2020). The E-Bike Potential: Estimating regional e-bike impacts on greenhouse gas emissions. Transportation Research Part D Transport and Environment. 87. 102482–102482. 96 indexed citations
9.
MacArthur, John, et al.. (2019). The Portland E-Scooter Experience. PDXScholar (Portland State University). 11 indexed citations
10.
MacArthur, John, et al.. (2018). Electric Boost: Insights from a National E-bike Owner Survey. PDXScholar (Portland State University). 5 indexed citations
11.
McNeil, Nathan, et al.. (2017). Current Efforts to Make Bikeshare More Equitable: Survey of System Owners and Operators. Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board. 2662(1). 160–167. 1 indexed citations
12.
Mansfield, Layla, et al.. (2016). Individual and contextual variables enhance transfer for a workplace eco-driving intervention. Transportation Research Part F Traffic Psychology and Behaviour. 37. 138–143. 10 indexed citations
13.
MacArthur, John, et al.. (2014). E-Bikes in the North America: Results from an online survey. 14 indexed citations
14.
MacArthur, John. (2013). Assessing Public Transportation Agencies’ Climate Change Adaptation Activities and Needs. Transportation Research Board 92nd Annual MeetingTransportation Research Board. 2 indexed citations
15.
Figliozzi, Miguel, et al.. (2010). Climate Action Plans and Long-Range Transportation Plans in the Pacific Northwest: a review of the state of practice. AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA). 4 indexed citations
16.
MacArthur, John. (2004). Called To Lead.
17.
MacArthur, John, et al.. (2004). Two International Finance Centre. 3 indexed citations
18.
Chan, Chun Man, et al.. (2000). Optimal Stiffness Performance Design of the North East Tower, Hong Kong Station. Rare & Special e-Zone (The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology). 1–8. 4 indexed citations
19.
MacArthur, John, et al.. (1985). The Canadian Beef and Pork Sectors: New Found Relevance of Live Market Information. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d agroeconomie. 33(2). 151–169. 3 indexed citations
20.
MacArthur, John. (1978). The charismatics: A doctrinal perspective. Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew). 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026