Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Factors influencing the choice of shared bicycles and shared electric bikes in Beijing
2016364 citationsChristopher Cherry, Megan S. Ryerson et al.profile →
E-bikes in the Mainstream: Reviewing a Decade of Research
2015362 citationsChristopher Cherry et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Christopher Cherry
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Christopher Cherry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Christopher Cherry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Christopher Cherry more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Christopher Cherry
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Christopher Cherry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Christopher Cherry. The network helps show where Christopher Cherry may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Christopher Cherry
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Christopher Cherry.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Christopher Cherry based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Christopher Cherry. Christopher Cherry is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Brakewood, Candace, et al.. (2019). A Literature Review on Fully Autonomous Buses. Transportation Research Board 98th Annual MeetingTransportation Research Board.6 indexed citations
Yoon, Taekwan, Christopher Cherry, Megan S. Ryerson, & John E. Bell. (2016). Migrating Towards Using Electric Vehicle on Campus-Proposed Method for Fleet Optimization. Transportation Research Board 95th Annual MeetingTransportation Research Board.1 indexed citations
14.
Langford, Brian Casey, et al.. (2015). Comparing Safety-Related Riding Behaviors on Bicycles and Electric Bicycles. Transportation Research Board 94th Annual MeetingTransportation Research Board.1 indexed citations
15.
Ling, Ziwen, Ying Ni, Christopher Cherry, & Keping Li. (2014). Pedestrian Level of Service at Signalized Intersections in China Using Contingent Field Survey and Pedestrian Crossing Video Simulation. Transportation Research Board 93rd Annual MeetingTransportation Research Board.4 indexed citations
16.
Chimba, Deo, et al.. (2014). Patterning Demographic and Socioeconomic Characteristics Affecting Pedestrian and Bicycle Crash Frequency. Transportation Research Board 93rd Annual MeetingTransportation Research Board.7 indexed citations
Cherry, Christopher. (2010). Electric Two-Wheelers in China: Promise Progress and Potential. eScholarship (California Digital Library). 1(37). 17–24.3 indexed citations
19.
Weinert, Jonathan X., et al.. (2008). Electric Two-Wheelers in China: Effect on Travel Behavior, Mode Shift, and User Safety Perceptions in a Medium-Sized City. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.2 indexed citations
20.
Cherry, Christopher, et al.. (2007). The Environmental Impacts of Electric Bikes in Chinese Cities. eScholarship (California Digital Library).3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.