John Lees

65 papers receiving 508 citations

Peers

John Lees
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Public Administration 61
  • Information Systems and Management 74
  • Political Science and International Relations 201
  • Strategy and Management 98
  • Conservation 21
Replace Jeffrey A. Raffel with:
Jeffrey A. Raffel United States
David M. Saunders Canada
Josiane Paddeu France
Margaret Lindorff Australia
Dennis Tourish United Kingdom
Geoff Plimmer New Zealand
Steven L. McShane Canada
Gregory Southey Australia
Tom Peters United States
Robert K. Robinson United States
John Lees relative to Jeffrey A. Raffel United States Jeffrey A. Raffel's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Jeffrey A. Raffel · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Lees

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Lees's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Lees with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Lees more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Lees

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Lees. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Lees. The network helps show where John Lees may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 19 scholars most cited alongside John Lees, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Lees Line = papers co-authored together John Lees links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 73 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1980103
2 198753
3 198253
4
Realities of small business information system implementation
198737
5 198034
6 200133
7 201526
8 201519
9 200818
10 198014
11 200114
12 201113
13 20109
14 19808
15 20058
16 19778
17 20037
18 19777
19 19977
20
American politics today
19587

About John Lees

John Lees is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Political Science and International Relations, Social Psychology, Philosophy and Conservation, having authored 73 papers that have together received 590 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (20 papers), Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics (16 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (6 papers), Art Therapy and Mental Health (5 papers), Counseling Practices and Supervision (3 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (3 papers), Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies (3 papers) and Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Administration (61 citations), Information Systems and Management (74 citations), Political Science and International Relations (201 citations), Strategy and Management (98 citations) and Conservation (21 citations). John Lees has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Malcolm Shaw, Samuel C. Patterson, Pamela Fisher, Gregory M. Rose, Matthew L. Meuter, Dawn Freshwater, Gordon Lynch, Jane Cahill, John Hills and John Dumbrell. Their work appears in journals such as International Affairs, American Political Science Review, Health An Interdisciplinary Journal for the Social Study of Health Illness and Medicine, The American Journal of Comparative Law and The International Journal on Media Management.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact