John Karl Scholz

6.5k citations
50 papers · 3.0k indexed · h-index 25

John Karl Scholz

48 papers receiving 2.5k citations

Peers

John Karl Scholz
Comparison fields: 5 of 85
  • Accounting 1.9k
  • Gender Studies 796
  • Demography 724
  • Economics and Econometrics 1.7k
  • Finance 439
Replace Annika Sundén with:
Annika Sundén Sweden
Richard Disney United Kingdom
Casey B. Mulligan United States
Paul Gregg United Kingdom
Nancy Jianakoplos United States
Nicholas Barr United Kingdom
John Ermisch United Kingdom
Till von Wachter United States
Nicola Fuchs‐Schündeln Germany
Matthias Doepke United States
John Karl Scholz relative to Annika Sundén Sweden Annika Sundén's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Annika Sundén · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Karl Scholz

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Karl Scholz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Karl Scholz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Karl Scholz more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Karl Scholz

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Karl Scholz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Karl Scholz. The network helps show where John Karl Scholz may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Karl Scholz, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Karl Scholz Line = papers co-authored together John Karl Scholz links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1
Making the Work-Based Safety Net Work Better
20176
2
WP 2016-344
20162
3 20161
4 2014100
5 20135
6 20134
7 20124
8 201131
9 201161
10 201127
11
A New Test of Borrowing Constraints for Education. NBER Working Paper No. 14879.
20093
12 20082
13
Are Americans Saving
200452
14 1997315
15
The Illusory Effects of Saving Incentives on Saving
199642
16
IRAs and Household Saving
199447
17 19944
18 1994366
19 19912
20
Comprehensive income taxation and rate reduction
19830

About John Karl Scholz

John Karl Scholz is a scholar working on Accounting, Gender Studies, Economics and Econometrics, Demography and General Health Professions, having authored 50 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis (28 papers), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (19 papers), Global Health Care Issues (14 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (14 papers), Retirement, Disability, and Employment (9 papers), Healthcare Policy and Management (7 papers), Housing Market and Economics (7 papers) and Taxation and Compliance Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Accounting (1.9k citations), Gender Studies (796 citations), Demography (724 citations), Economics and Econometrics (1.7k citations) and Finance (439 citations). John Karl Scholz has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Germany. Frequent co-authors include William G. Gale, Ananth Seshadri, Surachai Khitatrakun, Eric M. Engen, Reint Gropp, B. Douglas Bernheim, Patrick Bayer, Kamil Sicinski, Janet Currie and Marianne Bitler. Their work appears in journals such as National Tax Journal, The Journal of Human Resources, The Journal of Economic Perspectives, Economic Inquiry and Journal of Public Economics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026