Political Science and International Relations10.2k
Gender Studies7.3k
Sociology and Political Science4.4k
Replace Scandinavian Journal of Economics with:
Scandinavian Journal of EconomicsUnited States
Economic Development and Cultural ChangeUnited States
Review of Income and WealthUnited States
China Economic ReviewChina
Regional Science and Urban EconomicsUnited States
Journal of Comparative EconomicsUnited States
Journal of Economic PsychologyUnited States
Economic InquiryUnited States
European Journal of Political EconomyGermany
Journal of International DevelopmentUnited Kingdom
Scandinavian Journal of EconomicsUnited StatesView profile →
Citations per field, relative to National Tax Journal
National Tax Journal · 1×
×0.933.1kEE
×0.35.5kACCOU
×0.44.1kPSIR
×0.43.1kGS
×2.09.0kSPS
Citations per year, relative to National Tax Journal
National Tax Journal · 1×
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
Countries where authors publish in National Tax Journal
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in National Tax Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in National Tax Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites National Tax Journal more than expected).
Fields of papers published in National Tax Journal
This network shows the impact of papers published in National Tax Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in National Tax Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.