Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A Unified Framework for Measuring Preferences for Schools and Neighborhoods
2007644 citationsPatrick Bayer, R. S. McMillan et al.profile →
Place of Work and Place of Residence: Informal Hiring Networks and Labor Market Outcomes
This map shows the geographic impact of Patrick Bayer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Patrick Bayer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Patrick Bayer more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Patrick Bayer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Patrick Bayer. The network helps show where Patrick Bayer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Patrick Bayer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Patrick Bayer.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Patrick Bayer based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Patrick Bayer. Patrick Bayer is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Bayer, Patrick, Ryan Kennedy, Joonseok Yang, & Johannes Urpelainen. (2019). The Need for Impact Evaluation in Electricity Access Research. Strathprints: The University of Strathclyde institutional repository (University of Strathclyde).1 indexed citations
Bayer, Patrick. (2012). Why Do Democracies Exit International Agreements? The Role of Information in International Cooperation on Climate Change. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
12.
Bayer, Patrick, et al.. (2012). PRICE DISCRIMINATION IN THE HOUSING MARKET. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
13.
Anwar, Shamena, Patrick Bayer, & Randi Hjalmarsson. (2012). A Fair and Impartial Jury? The Role of Age in Jury Selection and Trial Outcomes. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.1 indexed citations
14.
Ellickson, Paul B., Patrick Bayer, Jason R. Blevins, & Peter Arcidiacono. (2010). Estimation of Dynamic Discrete Choice Models in Continuous Time. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.8 indexed citations
Arcidiacono, Peter, Patrick Bayer, & Aurel Hizmo. (2008). Beyond Signaling and Human Capital: Education and the Revelation of Ability. NBER Working Paper No. 13951.. National Bureau of Economic Research.5 indexed citations
17.
Bayer, Patrick, Shakeeb Khan, & Christopher Timmins. (2008). Nonparametric Identification and Estimation in a Generalized Roy Model. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
18.
Bayer, Patrick, et al.. (2007). A Unified Framework for Measuring Preferences for Schools and Neighborhoods. NBER Working Paper No. 13236.. National Bureau of Economic Research.10 indexed citations
19.
Bayer, Patrick & Stephen L. Ross. (2006). Identifying Individual and Group Effects in the Presence of Sorting: A Neighborhood Effects Application. OpenCommons - UConn (University of Connecticut).1 indexed citations
20.
Bayer, Patrick & R. S. McMillan. (2005). Choice and Competition in Local Education Markets. National Bureau of Economic Research.11 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.