Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by B. Douglas Bernheim
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of B. Douglas Bernheim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by B. Douglas Bernheim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites B. Douglas Bernheim more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by B. Douglas Bernheim
This network shows the impact of papers produced by B. Douglas Bernheim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by B. Douglas Bernheim. The network helps show where B. Douglas Bernheim may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of B. Douglas Bernheim
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of B. Douglas Bernheim.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of B. Douglas Bernheim based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with B. Douglas Bernheim. B. Douglas Bernheim is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Bernheim, B. Douglas. (2016). On the Voluntary and Involuntary Provision of Public Goods. American Economic Review. 76(4). 789–793.29 indexed citations
6.
Ambuehl, Sandro, B. Douglas Bernheim, & Annamaria Lusardi. (2014). The Effect of Financial Education on the Quality of Decision Making. SSRN Electronic Journal.9 indexed citations
7.
Ambuehl, Sandro, B. Douglas Bernheim, & Annamaria Lusardi. (2014). A Method for Evaluating the Quality of Financial Decision Making, with an Application to Financial Education. SSRN Electronic Journal.6 indexed citations
8.
Bernheim, B. Douglas, Andrey Fradkin, & И. О. Попов. (2011). The Welfare Economics of Default Options in 401(K) Plans. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
Bernheim, B. Douglas & Michael D. Whinston. (1997). Incomplete Contracts and Strategic Ambiguity. American Economic Review. 88(4). 902–932.356 indexed citations
Bernheim, B. Douglas & Michael D. Whinston. (1996). Exclusive Dealing. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
14.
Bernheim, B. Douglas, et al.. (1992). A Tax-Based Test of the Dividend Signaling Hypothesis. American Economic Review. 85(3). 532–551.97 indexed citations
15.
Bernheim, B. Douglas & John B. Shoven. (1991). Introduction to "National Saving and Economic Performance". NBER Chapters. 1–14.1 indexed citations
16.
Bernheim, B. Douglas & Lars‐Åke Levin. (1989). Social Security and personal saving: an analysis of expectations. American Economic Review. 79(2). 97–102.25 indexed citations
Bernheim, B. Douglas, Andrei Shleifer, & Lawrence H. Summers. (1986). The Strategic Bequest Motive. Journal of Labor Economics. 4(3, Part 2). S151–S182.761 indexed citations breakdown →
Bernheim, B. Douglas. (1981). A Note of Dynamic Tax Incidence. The Quarterly Journal of Economics. 96(4). 705–705.24 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.