John Ermisch

7.3k citations
133 papers · 4.3k · h-index 37

Impact in

Papers in

John Ermisch

125 papers receiving 3.7k citations

Peers

John Ermisch
Comparison fields: 5 of 106
  • Gender Studies 1.4k
  • Demography 1.5k
  • Sociology and Political Science 2.2k
  • Finance 438
  • Economics and Econometrics 1.2k
Replace Donald Cox with:
Donald Cox United States
Rebecca M. Blank United States
Timothy M. Smeeding United States
Junsen Zhang Hong Kong
Gary Burtless United States
Andrew Leigh Australia
Michael Sherraden United States
Lowell J. Taylor United States
Erzo F.P. Luttmer United States
Seth Sanders United States
John Ermisch relative to Donald Cox United States Donald Cox's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.5×
Donald Cox · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by John Ermisch

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Ermisch's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Ermisch with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Ermisch more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Ermisch

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Ermisch. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Ermisch. The network helps show where John Ermisch may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside John Ermisch, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with John Ermisch Line = papers co-authored together John Ermisch links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 133 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2001261
2 1999198
3 2001149
4 1989132
5 2009128
6 2003120
7 2008119
8 1989117
9 1997115
10 2006111
11 1993109
12 2010107
13 2008106
14 2021102
15 200092
16 199191
17 199690
18 200389
19 198487
20 198883

About John Ermisch

John Ermisch is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Gender Studies, Demography, Economics and Econometrics and Finance, having authored 133 papers that have together received 4.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (53 papers), Family Dynamics and Relationships (33 papers), Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving (23 papers), Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies (18 papers), Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism (14 papers), demographic modeling and climate adaptation (14 papers), Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis (13 papers) and Housing Market and Economics (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (1.4k citations), Demography (1.5k citations), Sociology and Political Science (2.2k citations), Finance (438 citations) and Economics and Econometrics (1.2k citations). John Ermisch has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Germany and United States. Frequent co-authors include Marco Francesconi, Robert E. Wright, Diego Gambetta, Alessandro Cigno, David J. Pevalin, Thomas Siedler, Naohiro Ogawa, Cheti Nicoletti, Valerie Kincade Oppenheimer and René Böheim. Their work appears in journals such as Population Studies, Journal of Population Economics, Scottish Journal of Political Economy, National Institute Economic Review and The Economic Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact