Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Countries citing papers authored by Robert Moffitt
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Moffitt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Moffitt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Moffitt more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Moffitt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Moffitt. The network helps show where Robert Moffitt may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert Moffitt
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert Moffitt.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert Moffitt based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Robert Moffitt. Robert Moffitt is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Moffitt, Robert. (2016). Economics of Means-Tested Transfer Programs in the United States, Volume 1. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.1 indexed citations
Moffitt, Robert. (2003). Means-Tested Transfer Programs in the United States. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.1 indexed citations
9.
Moffitt, Robert. (2002). The Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Program. SSRN Electronic Journal.6 indexed citations
10.
Cameron, Stephen V., et al.. (2001). Summary of Observations and Recommendations. SSRN Electronic Journal. 7(2). 3.1 indexed citations
11.
Moffitt, Robert & David W. Stevens. (2001). Changing Caseloads: Macro Influences and Micro Composition. Federal Reserve Bank of New York Economic policy review. 7(2). 37–51.19 indexed citations
12.
Blank, Rebecca M., Robert Moffitt, David W. Stevens, Susan Mayer, & June O’Neill. (2001). Session 2: Changing Caseloads: Macroeconomic Influences and Microeconomic Composition. Federal Reserve Bank of New York Economic policy review. 7(2). 23.8 indexed citations
13.
Flinn, Christopher J., Richard A. Kulka, Robert Moffitt, & Kenneth I. Wolpin. (2000). Introduction to the Journal of Human Resources special issue on data quality. The Journal of Human Resources. 36(3). 413–415.1 indexed citations
14.
Moffitt, Robert, David C. Ribar, & Mark Wilhelm. (1996). The Decline of Welfare Benefits in the U.S.: The Role of Wage Inequality. SSRN Electronic Journal.2 indexed citations
15.
Moffitt, Robert & Peter Gottschalk. (1994). Welfare dependence: Concepts, measures, and trends. American Economic Review. 84(2). 38–42.47 indexed citations
16.
Moffitt, Robert. (1993). Welfare Reform: An Economist's Perspective. Yale law & policy review. 11(1). 6.1 indexed citations
Moffitt, Robert. (1986). Work Incentives in the AFDC System: An Analysis of the 1981 Reforms. American Economic Review. 76(2). 219–223.24 indexed citations
Moffitt, Robert. (1977). Labor Supply and the Payroll Tax: Note. American Economic Review. 67(5). 1004–1005.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.