John Edmonstone

1.7k total citations · 1 hit paper
94 papers, 1.0k citations indexed

About

John Edmonstone is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, General Health Professions and Health Information Management. According to data from OpenAlex, John Edmonstone has authored 94 papers receiving a total of 1.0k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 40 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, 17 papers in General Health Professions and 15 papers in Health Information Management. Recurrent topics in John Edmonstone's work include Management and Organizational Studies (26 papers), Organizational Learning and Leadership (21 papers) and Healthcare Quality and Management (15 papers). John Edmonstone is often cited by papers focused on Management and Organizational Studies (26 papers), Organizational Learning and Leadership (21 papers) and Healthcare Quality and Management (15 papers). John Edmonstone collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Russia. John Edmonstone's co-authors include Mike Pedler, Giovanni Satta, Sue Smith, Ross Duncan, Chandana Sanyal, George Boak, Christine Abbott, Naomi Chambers, Ann Mahon and Helen Baxter and has published in prestigious journals such as BMC Health Services Research, Journal of Nursing Management and Leadership & Organization Development Journal.

In The Last Decade

John Edmonstone

80 papers receiving 855 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Capital in the twenty-first century

2015 254 citations John Edmonstone profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
John Edmonstone United Kingdom	16	304	253	163	147	139	94	1.0k
Amanda H. Goodall United Kingdom	15	233 0.8×	255 1.0×	225 1.4×	174 1.2×	163 1.2×	47	1.1k
Giuseppe Scaratti Italy	15	308 1.0×	284 1.1×	70 0.4×	124 0.8×	203 1.5×	73	1.2k
Liz Fulop Australia	16	320 1.1×	158 0.6×	54 0.3×	93 0.6×	90 0.6×	55	739
Rob Stones United Kingdom	15	213 0.7×	320 1.3×	49 0.3×	94 0.6×	480 3.5×	29	1.3k
Sankalp Chaturvedi United Kingdom	14	550 1.8×	160 0.6×	104 0.6×	65 0.4×	175 1.3×	30	1.4k
Kim Putters Netherlands	15	186 0.6×	343 1.4×	122 0.7×	42 0.3×	221 1.6×	44	853
Elizabeth Goodrick United States	13	669 2.2×	222 0.9×	119 0.7×	98 0.7×	280 2.0×	27	1.3k
Gianluca Veronesi United Kingdom	15	140 0.5×	211 0.8×	156 1.0×	176 1.2×	62 0.4×	36	680
John C. Lammers United States	17	278 0.9×	317 1.3×	59 0.4×	55 0.4×	229 1.6×	34	924
Daniele Mascia Italy	20	330 1.1×	323 1.3×	182 1.1×	57 0.4×	138 1.0×	67	1.0k

Countries citing papers authored by John Edmonstone

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of John Edmonstone's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John Edmonstone with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John Edmonstone more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by John Edmonstone

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by John Edmonstone. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John Edmonstone. The network helps show where John Edmonstone may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of John Edmonstone

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John Edmonstone. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John Edmonstone based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with John Edmonstone. John Edmonstone is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Satta, Giovanni & John Edmonstone. (2018). Consolidation of pathology services in England: have savings been achieved?. BMC Health Services Research. 18(1). 862–862. 13 indexed citations

2.

Edmonstone, John, et al.. (2014). Effective medical leadership development for a complex NHS. British Journal of Hospital Medicine. 75(8). 461–463. 3 indexed citations

3.

Edmonstone, John, et al.. (2011). Clinical leadership: the challenge of making the most of doctors in management. British Journal of Hospital Medicine. 72(6). 341–345. 7 indexed citations

4.

Edmonstone, John. (2008). Action learning as a developmental practice for clinical leadership. Keele Research Repository (Keele University). 3 indexed citations

5.

Edmonstone, John. (2008). Clinical leadership: the elephant in the room. The International Journal of Health Planning and Management. 24(4). 290–305. 67 indexed citations

6.

Smith, Sue & John Edmonstone. (2001). Learning to lead. Nursing Management. 8(3). 10–13. 3 indexed citations

7.

Edmonstone, John. (1999). Integrated workforce planning. Journal of Management in Medicine. 13(1). 33–40. 2 indexed citations

8.

Edmonstone, John. (1998). Ready for take‐off: realising the potential of the education and training consortia. PubMed. 24(5). 188–191. 2 indexed citations

9.

Edmonstone, John. (1997). The challenge of education commissioning ‐ part 2: a more radical change?. PubMed. 23(3). 84–87. 3 indexed citations

10.

Edmonstone, John, et al.. (1995). Career management support for nurses. PubMed. 21(5). 17–20. 2 indexed citations

11.

Edmonstone, John, et al.. (1995). The death (and rebirth?) of organization development. PubMed. 21(1). 28–33. 10 indexed citations

12.

Edmonstone, John. (1995). A step into the unknown? The new education and training contractingarrangements. PubMed. 21(6). 5–8. 6 indexed citations

13.

Edmonstone, John. (1995). Managing change: an emerging new consensus. PubMed. 21(1). 16–19. 20 indexed citations

14.

Edmonstone, John, et al.. (1993). Professional development. Growing pains.. PubMed. 89(6). 30–1. 1 indexed citations

15.

Edmonstone, John, et al.. (1993). EMPOWERMENT: HOLY GRAIL OR A BLINDING CASE OF THE OBVIOUS?. PubMed. 19(2). 22–8. 2 indexed citations

16.

Edmonstone, John, et al.. (1993). ADMINISTRATION TO BUSINESS MANAGEMENT. PubMed. 19(1). 14–5. 1 indexed citations

17.

Edmonstone, John, et al.. (1992). New Roles for Old. PubMed. 18(4). 34–5. 4 indexed citations

18.

Edmonstone, John, et al.. (1992). Business Planning: Learning by Doing. PubMed. 18(4). 23–5. 2 indexed citations

19.

Edmonstone, John. (1988). A false god? How relevant is competency-based education and training to the NHS?. PubMed. 84(6). 156–60. 2 indexed citations

20.

Edmonstone, John. (1982). The relevance of action learning to problem-solving and manager development in the NHS.. PubMed. 8(1). 16–9. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact