Johan J. Vossensteyn
About
In The Last Decade
Johan J. Vossensteyn
43 papers receiving 257 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Education 178
- Political Science and International Relations 154
- Sociology and Political Science 37
- Economics and Econometrics 37
- Demography 31
Countries citing papers authored by Johan J. Vossensteyn
This map shows the geographic impact of Johan J. Vossensteyn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Johan J. Vossensteyn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Johan J. Vossensteyn more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Johan J. Vossensteyn
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Johan J. Vossensteyn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Johan J. Vossensteyn. The network helps show where Johan J. Vossensteyn may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Johan J. Vossensteyn
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Johan J. Vossensteyn. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Johan J. Vossensteyn based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Johan J. Vossensteyn. Johan J. Vossensteyn is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | International Trends and Good Practices in Higher Education Internal Funding and Governance | 3 |
| 2 | Internal Funding and Governance in Latvian Higher Education Institutions: Status Quo Report | 2 |
| 3 | Higher education financing in Latvia: analysis of strengths and weaknesses | 3 |
| 4 | 29 | |
| 5 | Trends in universities of applied sciences in Europe | 1 |
| 6 | Professional masters. An international comparative study | 0 |
| 7 | Differentiëren in drievoud: omwille van kwaliteit en verscheidenheid van het hoger onderwijs: Advies van de Commissie Toekomstbestendig Hoger Onderwijs Stelsel | 10 |
| 8 | Selective admission in higher education: risks and limiting conditions | 2 |
| 9 | Higher Education Monitor | 37 |
| 10 | Wat valt er bij studenten te halen? De Notenkraker: | 1 |
| 11 | The Impact of ERASMUS on European Higher Education: Quality, Openness and Internationalisation; Final Case Studies Report from a Consortium of CHEPS, INCHER-Kassel and ECOTEC | 1 |
| 12 | Trends and issues in higher education | 0 |
| 13 | Internationalisation and ICT. EU funds and developments regarding ICT in higher education | 2 |
| 14 | MEETING THE NEED: A NEW ARCHITECTURE FOR CANADA’S STUDENT FINANCIAL AID SYSTEM | 1 |
| 15 | Fiscal Stress: Worldwide Trends in Higher Education Finance | 4 |
| 16 | Keeping up performances. An international survey of performance-based funding in higher education | 5 |
| 17 | Cost sharing in European higher education, Trends and debates | 1 |
| 18 | 11 | |
| 19 | Performance based research funding. An international comparative perspective | 1 |
| 20 | University Funding Mechanisms and related issues. A comparative analysis of the funding of universities in eight western European countries (P289) | 5 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.