Jody Sherman
About
In The Last Decade
Jody Sherman
9 papers receiving 362 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 39
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 195
- Education 190
- Statistics and Probability 176
- Psychiatry and Mental health 92
- Cognitive Neuroscience 57
Countries citing papers authored by Jody Sherman
This map shows the geographic impact of Jody Sherman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jody Sherman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jody Sherman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jody Sherman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jody Sherman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jody Sherman. The network helps show where Jody Sherman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jody Sherman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jody Sherman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jody Sherman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jody Sherman. Jody Sherman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 95 | |
| 2 | 14 | |
| 3 | 35 | |
| 4 | 92 | |
| 5 | 32 | |
| 6 | 25 | |
| 7 | 17 | |
| 8 | 41 | |
| 9 | 45 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.