Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Photoshopping the selfie: Self photo editing and photo investment are associated with body dissatisfaction in adolescent girls
2015277 citationsSiân A. McLean, Susan J. Paxton et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Jennifer Masters
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Jennifer Masters's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jennifer Masters with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jennifer Masters more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jennifer Masters
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jennifer Masters. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jennifer Masters. The network helps show where Jennifer Masters may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jennifer Masters
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jennifer Masters.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jennifer Masters based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jennifer Masters. Jennifer Masters is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Masters, Jennifer, et al.. (2015). TECHNOLOGY GOES BUSH: USING MOBILE TECHNOLOGIES TO SUPPORT LEARNING IN A BUSH KINDER PROGRAM. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 187–194.3 indexed citations
Masters, Jennifer, et al.. (2013). MAKING CONNECTIONS IN SCIENCE: ENGAGING WITH ICT TO ENHANCE CURRICULUM UNDERSTANDING. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 27(3). 95–100.2 indexed citations
Nykvist, Shaun, Margaret Lloyd, & Jennifer Masters. (2007). oz-TeacherNet 2.0: Redefining the Education Online Community. QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology). 325–328.
12.
Masters, Jennifer & Shaun Nykvist. (2006). Supporting play with digital media: Informal learning in the Fifth Dimension. QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology).3 indexed citations
13.
Lloyd, Margaret & Jennifer Masters. (2006). Task Profiling: A Task-Based Approach to Measuring the Integration of ICT in the Classroom. QUT ePrints (Queensland University of Technology).1 indexed citations
Masters, Jennifer, et al.. (2000). oz-TeacherNet: Supporting teacher use of Information and Communications Technologies in the Elementary Curriculum. EdMedia: World Conference on Educational Media and Technology. 2000(1). 1096–1100.
19.
Masters, Jennifer, et al.. (1998). Integrating Technology, Teaching and Learning with Early Childhood Professionals. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. 1997(1). 1352–1356.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.