Jason M. Tangen
- General Decision Sciences top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Face Recognition and Perception 14
- Aesthetic Perception and Analysis 5
-
- Creativity in Education and Neuroscience 5
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Deception detection and forensic psychology 12
- Family Practice top 10%
-
- Forensic and Genetic Research 7
-
- Biometric Identification and Security 7
-
- Jury Decision Making Processes 6
-
- Child and Animal Learning Development 6
- Co-authors
- Matthew B. ThompsonRuben LaukkonenRachel A SearstonLorraine G. AllanJonathan W. SchoolerGary EdmondShepard SiegelGianni Ribeiro
- Partner nations
- AustraliaCanadaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Jason M. Tangen
56 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 119
- General Decision Sciences 47
- Cognitive Neuroscience 386
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 214
- Social Psychology 257
- Family Practice 27
Countries citing papers authored by Jason M. Tangen
This map shows the geographic impact of Jason M. Tangen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jason M. Tangen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jason M. Tangen more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jason M. Tangen
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jason M. Tangen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jason M. Tangen. The network helps show where Jason M. Tangen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jason M. Tangen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 20 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 2 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 0 | |
| 9 | 2021 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2021 | 13 | |
| 11 | 2020 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2018 | 33 | |
| 13 | 2017 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2016 | 16 | |
| 15 | How to cross-examine forensic scientists: a guide for lawyers | 2014 | 23 |
| 16 | 2014 | 11 | |
| 17 | 2014 | 45 | |
| 18 | 2009 | 23 | |
| 19 | 2004 | 32 | |
| 20 | 2004 | 21 |
About Jason M. Tangen
Jason M. Tangen is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Family Practice and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 63 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Face Recognition and Perception (14 papers), Deception detection and forensic psychology (12 papers), Forensic and Genetic Research (7 papers), Biometric Identification and Security (7 papers), Jury Decision Making Processes (6 papers), Child and Animal Learning Development (6 papers), Aesthetic Perception and Analysis (5 papers) and Creativity in Education and Neuroscience (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (47 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (386 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (214 citations). Jason M. Tangen has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Matthew B. Thompson, Ruben Laukkonen, Rachel A Searston, Lorraine G. Allan, Jonathan W. Schooler, Gary Edmond, Shepard Siegel, Gianni Ribeiro, John R. Vokey and Blake M. McKimmie. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports and Psychological Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.