J. Adam Carter
- Philosophy top 0.2%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Plant Science
- Co-authors
- Duncan PritchardEmma C. GordonS. Orestis PalermosMark AlfanoJesper KallestrupBenjamin W. JarvisAna BadeaMarc Cheong
- Topics
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (83 papers)Philosophy and Theoretical Science (44 papers)Free Will and Agency (24 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
J. Adam Carter
114 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 115
- Philosophy 634
- Cognitive Neuroscience 474
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 315
- Sociology and Political Science 266
- Plant Science 110
Countries citing papers authored by J. Adam Carter
This map shows the geographic impact of J. Adam Carter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. Adam Carter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. Adam Carter more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J. Adam Carter
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. Adam Carter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. Adam Carter. The network helps show where J. Adam Carter may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. Adam Carter
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. Adam Carter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. Adam Carter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. Adam Carter. J. Adam Carter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 55 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 10 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 24 | |
| 11 | Epistemic Internalism, Content Externalism and the Subjective/Objective Justification Distinction | 10 |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 0 | |
| 14 | Objectual Understanding and the Value Problem | 21 |
| 15 | Instilling Global Citizenship within the International School Network | 1 |
| 16 | 5 | |
| 17 | 7 | |
| 18 | 23 | |
| 19 | Namelessness, Irony, and National Character in Contemporary Canadian Criticism and the Critical Tradition | 3 |
| 20 | Effective Organizational Structures for Remedial Programs | 1 |
About J. Adam Carter
J. Adam Carter is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 127 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (83 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (44 papers) and Free Will and Agency (24 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (634 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (474 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (315 citations). J. Adam Carter has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Duncan Pritchard, Emma C. Gordon, S. Orestis Palermos, Mark Alfano, Jesper Kallestrup, Benjamin W. Jarvis, Ana Badea, Marc Cheong, Robin McKenna and James R. Tucker. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Frontiers in Plant Science and Field Crops Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.