Richard I. Kemp
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 1%
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition top 1%
- Social Psychology top 1%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 1%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Co-authors
- Helen M. PatersonDavid WhiteGraham PikeNicola BraceA. Mike BurtonRosemary SnelgarKristy A. MartireRob Jenkins
- Topics
- Face Recognition and Perception (34 papers)Deception detection and forensic psychology (29 papers)Memory Processes and Influences (26 papers)
- Cited by
- Cognitive NeuroscienceExperimental and Cognitive PsychologyComputer Vision and Pattern Recognition
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Richard I. Kemp
117 papers receiving 3.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 175
- Cognitive Neuroscience 2.1k
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 1.1k
- Social Psychology 965
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 921
- Sociology and Political Science 439
Countries citing papers authored by Richard I. Kemp
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard I. Kemp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard I. Kemp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard I. Kemp more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard I. Kemp
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard I. Kemp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard I. Kemp. The network helps show where Richard I. Kemp may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard I. Kemp
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard I. Kemp. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard I. Kemp based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard I. Kemp. Richard I. Kemp is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 7 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 34 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 57 | |
| 10 | 10 | |
| 11 | 9 | |
| 12 | 83 | |
| 13 | 58 | |
| 14 | How to cross-examine forensic scientists: a guide for lawyers | 23 |
| 15 | Law's Looking Glass: Expert Identification Evidence Derived from Photographic and Video Images | 48 |
| 16 | 22 | |
| 17 | SPSS for Psychologists: A Guide to Data Analysis Using SPSS for Windows | 263 |
| 18 | 15 | |
| 19 | 69 | |
| 20 | 28 |
About Richard I. Kemp
Richard I. Kemp is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 120 papers that have together received 3.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Face Recognition and Perception (34 papers), Deception detection and forensic psychology (29 papers) and Memory Processes and Influences (26 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (2.1k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (921 citations) and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (1.1k citations). Richard I. Kemp has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Helen M. Paterson, David White, Graham Pike, Nicola Brace, A. Mike Burton, Rosemary Snelgar, Kristy A. Martire, Rob Jenkins, Robert West and Alice Towler. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Scientific Reports and Psychological Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.