A. Daniel Yarmey
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Social Psychology top 2%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Law top 0.5%
- Artificial Intelligence top 10%
- Co-authors
- Linda A. FoleyKalman G. CsapoClare MacMartinJérémy JacobElizabeth F. LoftusReid HastieAlfred E. CohnMichael J. Saks
- Topics
- Memory Processes and Influences (23 papers)Deception detection and forensic psychology (20 papers)Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare (13 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesIndonesia
In The Last Decade
A. Daniel Yarmey
73 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
- Cognitive Neuroscience 1.0k
- Social Psychology 554
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 396
- Law 209
- Artificial Intelligence 184
Countries citing papers authored by A. Daniel Yarmey
This map shows the geographic impact of A. Daniel Yarmey's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by A. Daniel Yarmey with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites A. Daniel Yarmey more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by A. Daniel Yarmey
This network shows the impact of papers produced by A. Daniel Yarmey. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by A. Daniel Yarmey. The network helps show where A. Daniel Yarmey may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of A. Daniel Yarmey
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of A. Daniel Yarmey. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of A. Daniel Yarmey based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with A. Daniel Yarmey. A. Daniel Yarmey is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Effect of Distributed Learning on the Identification of Normal-Tone and Whispered Voices | 4 |
| 2 | 45 | |
| 3 | 51 | |
| 4 | The elderly witness. | 14 |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 8 | |
| 8 | 45 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 19 | |
| 11 | 21 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 89 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | 6 | |
| 17 | 122 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 8 | |
| 20 | 12 |
About A. Daniel Yarmey
A. Daniel Yarmey is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Social Psychology and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 73 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Memory Processes and Influences (23 papers), Deception detection and forensic psychology (20 papers) and Interpreting and Communication in Healthcare (13 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (1.0k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (396 citations) and Social Psychology (554 citations). A. Daniel Yarmey has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Indonesia. Frequent co-authors include Linda A. Foley, Kalman G. Csapo, Clare MacMartin, Jérémy Jacob, Elizabeth F. Loftus, Reid Hastie, Alfred E. Cohn, Michael J. Saks, Amina Memon and Gary L. Wells. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Psychology, Child Abuse & Neglect and Memory & Cognition.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.