Blake M. McKimmie

2.0k citations
69 papers · 1.3k indexed · h-index 17

Blake M. McKimmie

61 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers

Blake M. McKimmie
Comparison fields: 5 of 113
  • Gender Studies 330
  • Applied Psychology 163
  • Law 192
  • Social Psychology 288
  • Marketing 128
Replace Riël Vermunt with:
Riël Vermunt Netherlands
Gregory Mitchell United States
Dena M. Gromet United States
Shawn M. Burn United States
Monica K. Miller United States
Katrin Auspurg Germany
Matthew K. Berent United States
Ellen Giebels Netherlands
Michael Sances United States
Connor Huff United States
Blake M. McKimmie relative to Riël Vermunt Netherlands Riël Vermunt's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
Riël Vermunt · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Blake M. McKimmie

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Blake M. McKimmie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Blake M. McKimmie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Blake M. McKimmie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Blake M. McKimmie

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Blake M. McKimmie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Blake M. McKimmie. The network helps show where Blake M. McKimmie may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Blake M. McKimmie, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Blake M. McKimmie Line = papers co-authored together Blake M. McKimmie links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20252
2 20241
3 20249
4 20221
5 20221
6 20214
7 202112
8 20207
9 20203
10
Flipping the Classroom Effectively: Evaluation Results from a Course at The University of Queensland
20181
11
How to flip a classroom and improve student learning and engagement: the case of PSYC1030
20175
12
Helping those who help themselves: Evaluating QPILCH’s Self Representation Service
20150
13 201460
14 20101
15 20096
16 2003110
17
Responses to a merger: The effects of premerger group status and integration pattern
20030
18 20033
19
The impact of expert testimony on jurors' decisions: The role of gender of the expert
20011
20 2000110

About Blake M. McKimmie

Blake M. McKimmie is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Law and Applied Psychology, having authored 69 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (25 papers), Jury Decision Making Processes (22 papers), Social and Intergroup Psychology (21 papers), Law in Society and Culture (12 papers), Legal Education and Practice Innovations (7 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (6 papers), Intimate Partner and Family Violence (4 papers) and Deception detection and forensic psychology (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (330 citations), Applied Psychology (163 citations) and Law (192 citations). Blake M. McKimmie has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Deborah J. Terry, Barbara Masser, Katherine M. White, Jaimi Greenslade, Joanne R. Smith, Michael A. Hogg, Russell Spears, Jolanda Jetten, Nyla R. Branscombe and Kate Lee. Their work appears in journals such as Psychological Bulletin, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin and Journal of Affective Disorders.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026