Janet C. Moore

705 total citations
15 papers, 219 citations indexed

About

Janet C. Moore is a scholar working on Education, Computer Science Applications and Political Science and International Relations. According to data from OpenAlex, Janet C. Moore has authored 15 papers receiving a total of 219 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Education, 5 papers in Computer Science Applications and 2 papers in Political Science and International Relations. Recurrent topics in Janet C. Moore's work include Online and Blended Learning (7 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (3 papers) and Diverse Education and Engineering Focus (3 papers). Janet C. Moore is often cited by papers focused on Online and Blended Learning (7 papers), Online Learning and Analytics (3 papers) and Diverse Education and Engineering Focus (3 papers). Janet C. Moore collaborates with scholars based in United States. Janet C. Moore's co-authors include John R. Bourne, Kaye Shelton and Frank Mayadas and has published in prestigious journals such as Online Learning and Journal of Veterinary Medical Education.

In The Last Decade

Janet C. Moore

13 papers receiving 175 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Janet C. Moore United States	6	175	68	42	35	21	15	219
Jason Rhode United States	4	176 1.0×	82 1.2×	52 1.2×	43 1.2×	15 0.7×	14	241
Michael Menchaca United States	6	250 1.4×	69 1.0×	75 1.8×	35 1.0×	29 1.4×	18	299
Pamela T. Northrup United States	6	168 1.0×	60 0.9×	51 1.2×	23 0.7×	28 1.3×	12	226
Karen Vignare United States	7	121 0.7×	63 0.9×	33 0.8×	44 1.3×	16 0.8×	18	216
Cheryl McFadden United States	7	221 1.3×	78 1.1×	47 1.1×	22 0.6×	39 1.9×	20	276
Sarah Lambert Australia	9	187 1.1×	166 2.4×	46 1.1×	59 1.7×	10 0.5×	20	342
Patricia J. Slagter van Tryon United States	7	146 0.8×	26 0.4×	58 1.4×	20 0.6×	27 1.3×	9	183
Eduardo X. Fuentes Abeledo Spain	8	173 1.0×	52 0.8×	36 0.9×	103 2.9×	12 0.6×	37	260
Leah E. Wickersham United States	8	243 1.4×	50 0.7×	92 2.2×	27 0.8×	45 2.1×	18	306
Thomas de Lange Norway	9	187 1.1×	24 0.4×	45 1.1×	32 0.9×	21 1.0×	29	273

Countries citing papers authored by Janet C. Moore

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Janet C. Moore's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janet C. Moore with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janet C. Moore more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Janet C. Moore

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janet C. Moore. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janet C. Moore. The network helps show where Janet C. Moore may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Janet C. Moore

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Janet C. Moore. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Janet C. Moore based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Janet C. Moore. Janet C. Moore is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

15 of 15 papers shown

1.

Moore, Janet C., et al.. (2019). THE ROAD TO RETENTION: A CLOSER LOOK AT INSTITUTIONS THAT ACHIEVE HIGH COURSE COMPLETION RATES. Online Learning. 13(3). 7 indexed citations

2.

Moore, Janet C., et al.. (2019). GETTING BETTER: ALN AND STUDENT SUCCESS. Online Learning. 10(3). 2 indexed citations

3.

Bourne, John R., et al.. (2019). INCREASING ACCESS IN ONLINE HIGHER EDUCATION. Online Learning. 10(3). 3 indexed citations

4.

Moore, Janet C.. (2019). A SYNTHESIS OF SLOAN-C EFFECTIVE PRACTICES, AUGUST 2005. Online Learning. 9(3).

5.

Moore, Janet C., et al.. (2019). GETTING BETTER: ALN AND STUDENT SUCCESS. Online Learning. 13(3). 5 indexed citations

6.

Moore, Janet C.. (2019). A SYNTHESIS OF SLOAN-C EFFECTIVE PRACTICES - December 2008. Online Learning. 12(3-4). 8 indexed citations

7.

Moore, Janet C.. (2019). A SYNTHESIS OF SLOAN-C EFFECTIVE PRACTICES. Online Learning. 13(4). 22 indexed citations

8.

Moore, Janet C.. (2019). COLLABORATION ONLINE: SLOAN-C RESOURCES. Online Learning. 10(1).

9.

Moore, Janet C. & Kaye Shelton. (2013). Social and Student Engagement and Support: The Sloan-C Quality Scorecard for the Administration of Online Programs. Online Learning. 17(1). 4 indexed citations

10.

Moore, Janet C.. (2012). A Synthesis of Sloan-C Effective Practices, as of December 2011. Online Learning. 16(1). 3 indexed citations

11.

Moore, Janet C.. (2010). A Synthesis of Sloan-C Effective Practices, November 2010. Online Learning. 14(3). 10 indexed citations

12.

Moore, Janet C.. (2007). Maintaining Quality in Online Education. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education. 34(3). 243–250. 3 indexed citations

13.

Moore, Janet C.. (2005). The Sloan Consortium Quality Framework And The Five Pillars. 111 indexed citations

14.

Bourne, John R. & Janet C. Moore. (2005). Elements of Quality Online Education. 39 indexed citations

15.

Moore, Janet C.. (1999). Building and maintaining the truly affordable golf course. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact