Jane Stephens

19 papers receiving 202 citations

Peers

Jane Stephens
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Library and Information Sciences 58
  • History and Philosophy of Science 21
  • Information Systems 89
  • Education 112
  • Safety Research 30
Replace Sarah Park Dahlen with:
Sarah Park Dahlen United States
Heidi Jacobs Canada
Lori Arp United States
Pauline Hagel Australia
Julie Waters United States
Davide Simone Giannoni Italy
Qingmin Shi United States
Yasar Bodur United States
Marlene Asselin Canada
George Lorenzo United States
Jane Stephens relative to Sarah Park Dahlen United States Sarah Park Dahlen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×16×
Sarah Park Dahlen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Stephens

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Stephens's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Stephens with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Stephens more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Stephens

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Stephens. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Stephens. The network helps show where Jane Stephens may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 7 scholars most cited alongside Jane Stephens, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Stephens Line = papers co-authored together Jane Stephens links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 200559
2 200028
3 201124
4 200916
5 200816
6 201316
7 201315
8 201114
9 200111
10 200510
11 200810
12 20099
13 20036
14 20114
15 20163
16 19993
17 20183
18 20212
19 20111
20 20111

About Jane Stephens

Jane Stephens is a scholar working on Information Systems, Library and Information Sciences, Education, History and Philosophy of Science and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, having authored 21 papers that have together received 251 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Library Science and Information Literacy (8 papers), Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (7 papers), Web and Library Services (5 papers), Publishing and Scholarly Communication (3 papers), scientometrics and bibliometrics research (3 papers), Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion (3 papers), Academic Writing and Publishing (2 papers) and Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Library and Information Sciences (58 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (21 citations), Information Systems (89 citations), Education (112 citations) and Safety Research (30 citations). Jane Stephens has collaborated with scholars based in United States and France. Frequent co-authors include Greg Conderman, David Hubbard, Gang Wan, Margaret Foster, Robin R. Sewell, Michael Hazelkorn and S. Zheng. Their work appears in journals such as Serials Review, Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, Preventing School Failure Alternative Education for Children and Youth, The Journal of Academic Librarianship and portal Libraries and the Academy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact