Serials Review

1.9k papers and 13.9k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.9k papers published in Serials Review in the last decades have received a total of 13.9k indexed citations. Papers published in Serials Review usually cover Information Systems (982 papers), Library and Information Sciences (170 papers) and History and Philosophy of Science (133 papers) specifically the topics of Library Collection Development and Digital Resources (677 papers), Library Science and Information Systems (367 papers) and Web and Library Services (150 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Serials Review are Daniel Hanne, Margaret Ferley, Mark Needleman, C. Edward Wall, Carol M Kelley, Maria Collins, Forrest L. Dimmick, Xiaotian Chen, Peter Murray‐Rust and Sharon Dyas-Correia.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Serials Review

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Serials Review. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Serials Review.

Countries where authors publish in Serials Review

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Serials Review. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Serials Review with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Serials Review more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025