James Milton

3.1k total citations · 1 hit paper
58 papers, 1.6k citations indexed

About

James Milton is a scholar working on Developmental and Educational Psychology, Language and Linguistics and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, James Milton has authored 58 papers receiving a total of 1.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 41 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology, 26 papers in Language and Linguistics and 20 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in James Milton's work include Second Language Acquisition and Learning (40 papers), EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (16 papers) and Natural Language Processing Techniques (16 papers). James Milton is often cited by papers focused on Second Language Acquisition and Learning (40 papers), EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (16 papers) and Natural Language Processing Techniques (16 papers). James Milton collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Saudi Arabia and Greece. James Milton's co-authors include Paul Meara, Jeanine Treffers‐Daller, Ahmed Masrai, Helmut Daller, Tess Fitzpatrick, Michael Daller, David Malvern, Brian Richards, Boyd Richards and Hayley Hutchings and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Investigative Dermatology and System.

In The Last Decade

James Milton

56 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Hit Papers

Measuring Second Language Vocabulary Acquisition 2009 2026 2014 2020 2009 100 200 300

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
James Milton United Kingdom 20 1.2k 953 576 445 210 58 1.6k
YouJin Kim United States 23 985 0.8× 1.3k 1.3× 189 0.3× 883 2.0× 338 1.6× 65 1.7k
David D. Qian Hong Kong 15 1.2k 1.0× 677 0.7× 524 0.9× 237 0.5× 225 1.1× 22 1.4k
Jang Ho Lee South Korea 19 407 0.3× 438 0.5× 387 0.7× 323 0.7× 165 0.8× 64 1.1k
June Eyckmans Belgium 20 976 0.8× 927 1.0× 372 0.6× 340 0.8× 100 0.5× 66 1.3k
Diane Schmitt United Kingdom 10 1.3k 1.1× 871 0.9× 632 1.1× 326 0.7× 221 1.1× 15 1.6k
Ineke Vedder Netherlands 18 913 0.8× 983 1.0× 284 0.5× 670 1.5× 294 1.4× 44 1.4k
James F. Lee United States 20 1.0k 0.8× 1.2k 1.2× 153 0.3× 612 1.4× 254 1.2× 71 1.6k
Yongqi Gu New Zealand 17 1.2k 1.0× 1.2k 1.3× 165 0.3× 668 1.5× 502 2.4× 40 1.8k
Noriko Iwashita Australia 18 649 0.5× 1.1k 1.1× 130 0.2× 724 1.6× 290 1.4× 42 1.4k
Jonathan Newton New Zealand 15 630 0.5× 864 0.9× 186 0.3× 423 1.0× 263 1.3× 36 1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by James Milton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Milton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Milton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Milton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Milton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Milton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Milton. The network helps show where James Milton may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James Milton

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James Milton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James Milton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James Milton. James Milton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Masrai, Ahmed, et al.. (2021). Measuring the contribution of specialist vocabulary knowledge to academic achievement: disentangling effects of multiple types of word knowledge. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education. 6(1). 12 indexed citations
2.
Milton, James, et al.. (2018). Frequency and the lexis of low level EFL texts. Aristotle University of Thessaloniki. 13. 444–455. 5 indexed citations
3.
Alhazmi, Khaled, James Milton, & Stephen J. Johnston. (2018). Examining ‘vowel blindness’ among native Arabic speakers reading English words from the perspective of eye-tracking. System. 80. 235–245. 5 indexed citations
4.
Milton, James, et al.. (2017). Using Category Generation Tasks to Estimate Productive Vocabulary Size in a Foreign Language.. 12(1). 143–159. 5 indexed citations
5.
Dobbs, Thomas D., et al.. (2017). 571 The readability of online patient resources for skin cancer treatment. Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 137(10). S290–S290. 3 indexed citations
6.
Masrai, Ahmed & James Milton. (2016). How Different Is Arabic from Other Languages? The Relationship Between Word Frequency and Lexical Coverage. Journal of applied linguistics and language research. 3(1). 15–35. 4 indexed citations
7.
Masrai, Ahmed & James Milton. (2015). Investigating the Relationship between the Morphological Processing of Regular and Irregular Words and L2 Vocabulary Acquisition. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature. 4(4). 1 indexed citations
8.
Milton, James. (2015). French lexis and formal exams in the British foreign language classroom. Revue française de linguistique appliquée. Vol. XX(1). 107–119. 7 indexed citations
9.
Milton, James & Jeanine Treffers‐Daller. (2013). Vocabulary size revisited: the link between vocabulary size and academic achievement. Applied Linguistics Review. 4(1). 151–172. 94 indexed citations
10.
Milton, James, et al.. (2012). Vocabulary input, vocabulary uptake and approaches to language teaching. Language Learning Journal. 40(1). 1–5. 7 indexed citations
11.
Milton, James, et al.. (2012). The Vocabulary Knowledge of University Students in Saudi Arabia. 35 indexed citations
12.
Richards, Brian, Michael Daller, David Malvern, et al.. (2009). Vocabulary Studies in First and Second Language Acquisition. Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks. 23 indexed citations
13.
Treffers‐Daller, Jeanine, Michael Daller, David Malvern, et al.. (2008). Knowledge and use of the lexicon in French as a second language. Cambridge University Press eBooks.
14.
Milton, James. (2008). French vocabulary breadth among learners in the British school and university system: comparing knowledge over time. Journal of French Language Studies. 18(3). 333–348. 18 indexed citations
15.
Daller, Helmut, James Milton, & Jeanine Treffers‐Daller. (2007). Modelling and Assessing Vocabulary Knowledge. Cureus. 14(12). e32885–e32885. 94 indexed citations
16.
Milton, James, et al.. (2006). Comparing Phonological and Orthographic Vocabulary Size: Do Vocabulary Tests Underestimate the Knowledge of Some Learners?. Canadian Modern Language Review/ La Revue canadienne des langues vivantes. 63(1). 127–147. 47 indexed citations
17.
Milton, James. (2004). Comparing the lexical difficulty of French reading comprehension exam texts. Language Learning Journal. 30(1). 5–11. 5 indexed citations
18.
Milton, James, et al.. (2000). Assessing English for academic purposes. P. Lang eBooks. 22 indexed citations
19.
Milton, James, et al.. (2000). VIRLAN: Collaborative Foreign Language Learning on the Internet for Primary Age Children: Problems and a Solution. Educational Technology & Society. 3. 6 indexed citations
20.
Milton, James & Paul Meara. (1998). Are the British really bad at learning foreign languages?. Language Learning Journal. 18(1). 68–76. 55 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026