James E. McLean

2.3k total citations
106 papers, 1.8k citations indexed

About

James E. McLean is a scholar working on Education, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Developmental and Educational Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, James E. McLean has authored 106 papers receiving a total of 1.8k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Education, 19 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 18 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology. Recurrent topics in James E. McLean's work include Cognitive Abilities and Testing (17 papers), Language Development and Disorders (8 papers) and Behavioral and Psychological Studies (7 papers). James E. McLean is often cited by papers focused on Cognitive Abilities and Testing (17 papers), Language Development and Disorders (8 papers) and Behavioral and Psychological Studies (7 papers). James E. McLean collaborates with scholars based in United States, South Korea and Germany. James E. McLean's co-authors include Alan S. Kaufman, Cecil R. Reynolds, Lee McLean, Nancy C. Brady, James M. Ernest, Dara W. Childs, James C. Kaufman, Min Zhang, Robert L. Chastain and Christopher H. Skinner and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, American Journal of Physiology-Endocrinology and Metabolism and Psychological Assessment.

In The Last Decade

James E. McLean

90 papers receiving 1.6k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
James E. McLean United States 25 678 494 359 350 234 106 1.8k
Henrik Danielsson Sweden 20 459 0.7× 1.3k 2.6× 389 1.1× 186 0.5× 156 0.7× 97 2.1k
Mariola Moeyaert United States 25 1.1k 1.7× 560 1.1× 126 0.4× 325 0.9× 225 1.0× 93 1.9k
Naomi Josman Israel 25 408 0.6× 520 1.1× 143 0.4× 268 0.8× 262 1.1× 109 1.8k
Stephen W. Kelly United Kingdom 19 397 0.6× 597 1.2× 332 0.9× 205 0.6× 89 0.4× 76 1.6k
Jodie M. Plumert United States 29 725 1.1× 656 1.3× 300 0.8× 171 0.5× 98 0.4× 106 2.5k
Matthew S. Goodwin United States 33 460 0.7× 1.9k 3.9× 458 1.3× 572 1.6× 576 2.5× 103 3.2k
Mary M. Smyth United Kingdom 28 1.6k 2.4× 1.4k 2.9× 455 1.3× 166 0.5× 294 1.3× 65 3.3k
Norman R. Ellis United States 25 716 1.1× 737 1.5× 377 1.1× 148 0.4× 152 0.6× 99 1.9k
Vicky Lewis United Kingdom 23 811 1.2× 1.1k 2.1× 107 0.3× 455 1.3× 399 1.7× 48 2.0k
Rumen Manolov Spain 21 748 1.1× 402 0.8× 71 0.2× 231 0.7× 48 0.2× 80 1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by James E. McLean

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James E. McLean's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James E. McLean with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James E. McLean more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James E. McLean

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James E. McLean. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James E. McLean. The network helps show where James E. McLean may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James E. McLean

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James E. McLean. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James E. McLean based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James E. McLean. James E. McLean is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
McLean, James E., et al.. (2013). THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN A UNIVERSITY'S APPEARANCE IN A DIVISION I BASKETBALL OR FOOTBALL CHAMPIONSHIP GAME AND ENROLLMENT. UMI eBooks. 1 indexed citations
2.
McLean, James E., et al.. (2008). Developing Teacher Leaders in Science: Catalysts for Improved Science Teaching and Student Learning. Science educator. 17(2). 45–56. 8 indexed citations
3.
Barnette, J. Jackson & James E. McLean. (2005). Type I Error Of Four Pairwise Mean Comparison Procedures Conducted As Protected And Unprotected Tests. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods. 4(2). 446–459. 13 indexed citations
4.
McLean, James E., et al.. (2004). Integrating Technology into Teacher Education Through Curriculum Mapping: An Update on Year Two. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. 2004(1). 2089–2094. 2 indexed citations
5.
McLean, James E., et al.. (2004). Recipients' Views of the Role of Christa McAuliffe Fellowships in Science Education.. Science educator. 13(1). 49–57. 1 indexed citations
6.
McLean, James E. & Alan S. Kaufman. (2000). Research in the Schools, 2000.. Research in the schools. 7. 42 indexed citations
7.
Barnette, J. Jackson & James E. McLean. (1999). Empirically Based Criteria for Determining Meaningful Effect Size.. Frontiers in Psychiatry. 14. 1200403–1200403. 5 indexed citations
8.
McLean, James E., et al.. (1999). How children learn language. 8 indexed citations
9.
Barnette, J. Jackson & James E. McLean. (1999). Choosing a Multiple Comparison Procedure Based on Alpha.. 96(3). 243–250. 1 indexed citations
10.
McLean, James E. & James M. Ernest. (1998). The Role of Statistical Significance Testing In Educational Research. Research in the schools. 5(2). 15–22. 70 indexed citations
11.
Ernest, James M. & James E. McLean. (1998). Fight the Good Fight: A Response to Thompson, Knapp, and Levin. Research in the schools. 5(2). 59–62. 7 indexed citations
12.
McLean, James E. & Alan S. Kaufman. (1998). Statistical Significance Testing.. Research in the schools. 5(2). 1 indexed citations
13.
McLean, James E., et al.. (1997). Twenty-Five Years of Data on Educational Funding and Student Achievement: What Does It Mean?. Educational research quarterly. 21(2). 3–11. 2 indexed citations
14.
Kaufman, Alan S., et al.. (1996). Comparison of three WISC-III short forms: Weighing psychometric, clinical, and practical factors. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology. 25(1). 97–105. 114 indexed citations
15.
McLean, James E. & Alan S. Kaufman. (1995). The Harrington-O'Shea Career Decision-Making System (CDM) and the Kaufman Adolescent and Adult Intelligence Test (KAIT): Relationship of Interest Scale Scores to Fluid and Crystallized IQs at Ages 12 to 22 Years.. Research in the schools. 2(1). 63–73. 2 indexed citations
16.
Ross, Steven M., et al.. (1994). Do Funding Inequities Produce Educational Disparity? Research Issues in the Alabama Case.. Research in the schools. 1(2). 3–14. 1 indexed citations
17.
McLean, James E., et al.. (1994). Sequential-Simultaneous Profile Analysis of Korean Children's Performance on the Kaufman Assessment Battery for Children (K-ABC).. Research in the schools. 1(2). 29–35. 1 indexed citations
18.
Kaufman, Alan S. & James E. McLean. (1994). The Relationship of the Murphy-Meisgeier Type Indicator for Children to Sex, Race, and Fluid-Crystallized Intelligence on the KAIT at Ages 11 to 15.. Research in the schools. 1(1). 37–47. 2 indexed citations
19.
Kaufman, Alan S., James E. McLean, & Cecil R. Reynolds. (1988). Sex, race, residence, region, and education differences on the 11 WAIS-R subtests. Journal of Clinical Psychology. 44(2). 231–248. 135 indexed citations
20.
McLean, James E., et al.. (1978). A transactional approach to early language training. 126 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026