J. L. Molina‐Cano
- Plant Science top 1%
- Nutrition and Dietetics top 2%
- Genetics top 10%
- Agronomy and Crop Science top 2%
- Molecular Biology
- Co-authors
- I. RomagosaJ. S. SwanstonA.M. Pérez-VendrellMarian MoralejoErnesto IgartuaM. Pilar GraciaJ. L. ArausAna M. Casas
- Topics
- Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology (43 papers)Food composition and properties (20 papers)Genetics and Plant Breeding (20 papers)
- Partner nations
- SpainUnited StatesCzechia
In The Last Decade
J. L. Molina‐Cano
59 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Plant Science 1.4k
- Nutrition and Dietetics 358
- Genetics 309
- Agronomy and Crop Science 287
- Molecular Biology 211
Countries citing papers authored by J. L. Molina‐Cano
This map shows the geographic impact of J. L. Molina‐Cano's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by J. L. Molina‐Cano with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites J. L. Molina‐Cano more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by J. L. Molina‐Cano
This network shows the impact of papers produced by J. L. Molina‐Cano. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by J. L. Molina‐Cano. The network helps show where J. L. Molina‐Cano may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of J. L. Molina‐Cano
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of J. L. Molina‐Cano. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of J. L. Molina‐Cano based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with J. L. Molina‐Cano. J. L. Molina‐Cano is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 14 | |
| 2 | 21 | |
| 3 | 59 | |
| 4 | 37 | |
| 5 | 53 | |
| 6 | 32 | |
| 7 | 37 | |
| 8 | 14 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 33 | |
| 11 | 28 | |
| 12 | 15 | |
| 13 | 25 | |
| 14 | Grain quality of a barley mutant and its parent cultivar in Spain and Scotland | 8 |
| 15 | 21 | |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 24 | |
| 18 | 52 | |
| 19 | 31 | |
| 20 | Hordeum spontaneum C. Koch em. Bacht, collected in southern Morocco. | 14 |
About J. L. Molina‐Cano
J. L. Molina‐Cano is a scholar working on Plant Science, Nutrition and Dietetics and Agronomy and Crop Science, having authored 59 papers that have together received 1.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology (43 papers), Food composition and properties (20 papers) and Genetics and Plant Breeding (20 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Plant Science (1.4k citations), Agronomy and Crop Science (287 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (358 citations). J. L. Molina‐Cano has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, United States and Czechia. Frequent co-authors include I. Romagosa, J. S. Swanston, A.M. Pérez-Vendrell, Marian Moralejo, Ernesto Igartua, M. Pilar Gracia, J. L. Araus, Ana M. Casas, Jordi Voltas and J. M. Lasa. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Experimental Botany, Journal of Chromatography A and Theoretical and Applied Genetics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.