Michael R. Dougherty

2.7k total citations
72 papers, 1.7k citations indexed

About

Michael R. Dougherty is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, General Decision Sciences and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, Michael R. Dougherty has authored 72 papers receiving a total of 1.7k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 28 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 23 papers in General Decision Sciences and 16 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in Michael R. Dougherty's work include Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (23 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (17 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (14 papers). Michael R. Dougherty is often cited by papers focused on Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (23 papers), Memory Processes and Influences (17 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (14 papers). Michael R. Dougherty collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Sweden. Michael R. Dougherty's co-authors include Charles F. Gettys, Amber Sprenger, Rick P. Thomas, J. Isaiah Harbison, Zachary Horne, Sharona M. Atkins, Ana M. Franco‐Watkins, Louis Narens, Thomas O. Nelson and Scott D. Gronlund and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Psychological Review.

In The Last Decade

Michael R. Dougherty

68 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Michael R. Dougherty United States 24 650 511 394 386 303 72 1.7k
Adam N. Sanborn United Kingdom 18 638 1.0× 324 0.6× 457 1.2× 399 1.0× 298 1.0× 56 1.6k
Brandon M. Turner United States 27 1.3k 2.1× 637 1.2× 387 1.0× 405 1.0× 138 0.5× 77 2.4k
Aidan Feeney United Kingdom 19 306 0.5× 371 0.7× 212 0.5× 240 0.6× 450 1.5× 79 1.5k
Clintin P. Davis‐Stober United States 18 266 0.4× 492 1.0× 137 0.3× 166 0.4× 77 0.3× 62 1.1k
William M. Petrusic Canada 24 1.0k 1.6× 298 0.6× 138 0.4× 477 1.2× 412 1.4× 55 1.8k
York Hagmayer Germany 19 305 0.5× 312 0.6× 505 1.3× 121 0.3× 584 1.9× 78 1.3k
W.A. Wagenaar Netherlands 13 239 0.4× 256 0.5× 128 0.3× 111 0.3× 102 0.3× 31 1.1k
Adele Diederich Germany 28 1.5k 2.3× 743 1.5× 166 0.4× 1.3k 3.4× 71 0.2× 93 3.0k
Joris Mulder Netherlands 24 233 0.4× 38 0.1× 257 0.7× 403 1.0× 113 0.4× 79 1.7k
Xiangen Hu United States 26 428 0.7× 66 0.1× 926 2.4× 222 0.6× 607 2.0× 111 2.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Michael R. Dougherty

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michael R. Dougherty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael R. Dougherty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael R. Dougherty more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michael R. Dougherty

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael R. Dougherty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael R. Dougherty. The network helps show where Michael R. Dougherty may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael R. Dougherty

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael R. Dougherty. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael R. Dougherty based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael R. Dougherty. Michael R. Dougherty is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Dougherty, Michael R., et al.. (2023). Promoting values-based assessment in review, promotion, and tenure processes. 3 indexed citations
2.
Dougherty, Michael R., Harry Jones, John A. Hogan, et al.. (2023). Theoretical design of a space bioprocessing system to produce recombinant proteins. npj Microgravity. 9(1). 78–78. 2 indexed citations
3.
Dougherty, Michael R., et al.. (2022). Perplexing findings during laparoscopic evaluation for tubal factor infertility resulting from a gastric leak after bariatric surgery: A case report. Case Reports in Women s Health. 36. e00460–e00460. 1 indexed citations
4.
Dougherty, Michael R., et al.. (2018). Optimizing Cue Use in Student Restudy Decisions.. Cognitive Science. 2 indexed citations
6.
Salinas, Christine M., et al.. (2016). Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder Status and Baseline Neurocognitive Performance in High School Athletes. Applied Neuropsychology Child. 5(4). 264–272. 17 indexed citations
7.
Harbison, J. Isaiah, et al.. (2013). Intrusions and the Decision to Terminate Memory Search.. Cognitive Science. 35(35). 2 indexed citations
8.
Sprenger, Amber, et al.. (2013). When decision heuristics and science collide. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 21(2). 268–282. 43 indexed citations
9.
Harbison, J. Isaiah, Sharona M. Atkins, & Michael R. Dougherty. (2012). N-back Performance: Comparing Assessment and Training Performance. Cognitive Science. 34(34). 2 indexed citations
10.
Dougherty, Michael R., et al.. (2012). Deliberations on Unconscious thought Theory. Frontiers in Psychology. 3. 350–350. 1 indexed citations
11.
Marewski, Julian N., et al.. (2011). Four challenges for cognitive research on the recognition heuristic and a call for a research strategy shift. Judgment and Decision Making. 6(1). 89–99. 18 indexed citations
12.
Harbison, J. Isaiah, Sharona M. Atkins, & Michael R. Dougherty. (2011). N-back Training Task Performance: Analysis and Model. Cognitive Science. 33(33). 13 indexed citations
13.
Sprenger, Amber, Michael R. Dougherty, Sharona M. Atkins, et al.. (2011). Implications of Cognitive Load for Hypothesis Generation and Probability Judgment. Frontiers in Psychology. 2. 129–129. 31 indexed citations
14.
Thomas, Rick P., Michael R. Dougherty, Amber Sprenger, & J. Isaiah Harbison. (2008). Diagnostic hypothesis generation and human judgment.. Psychological Review. 115(1). 155–185. 146 indexed citations
15.
Franco‐Watkins, Ana M. & Michael R. Dougherty. (2006). Word concreteness and encoding effects on context-dependent discrimination. Memory & Cognition. 34(5). 973–985. 4 indexed citations
16.
Franco‐Watkins, Ana M., Peter L. Derks, & Michael R. Dougherty. (2003). Reasoning in the Monty Hall problem: Examining choice behaviour and probability judgements. Thinking & Reasoning. 9(1). 67–90. 24 indexed citations
17.
Dougherty, Michael R., et al.. (2003). Hypothesis generation, probability judgment, and individual differences in working memory capacity. Acta Psychologica. 113(3). 263–282. 88 indexed citations
18.
Dougherty, Michael R. & Ana M. Franco‐Watkins. (2003). Reducing bias in frequency judgment by improving source monitoring. Acta Psychologica. 113(1). 23–44. 5 indexed citations
19.
Canning, John, et al.. (2002). Aiding Planning in Air Traffic Control: An Experimental Investigation of the Effects of Perceptual Information Integration. Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. 44(3). 404–412. 8 indexed citations
20.
Dougherty, Michael R.. (2001). Integration of the ecological and error models of overconfidence using a multiple-trace memory model.. Journal of Experimental Psychology General. 130(4). 579–599. 53 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026