Amber Sprenger
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Artificial Intelligence top 10%
- General Decision Sciences top 5%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Michael R. DoughertyRick P. ThomasJ. Isaiah HarbisonRobert O. HartmanNathan F. DieckmannKenneth G. DeMarreeSharona M. AtkinsMichael F. Bunting
- Topics
- Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (6 papers)Forecasting Techniques and Applications (4 papers)Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (4 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPsychological ReviewJournal of Experimental Psychology General
- Partner nations
- United StatesFranceAustralia
In The Last Decade
Amber Sprenger
17 papers receiving 496 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
- Cognitive Neuroscience 153
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 139
- Artificial Intelligence 127
- General Decision Sciences 104
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 94
Countries citing papers authored by Amber Sprenger
This map shows the geographic impact of Amber Sprenger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amber Sprenger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amber Sprenger more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Amber Sprenger
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amber Sprenger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amber Sprenger. The network helps show where Amber Sprenger may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amber Sprenger
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amber Sprenger. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amber Sprenger based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amber Sprenger. Amber Sprenger is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 11 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 74 | |
| 11 | 30 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 43 | |
| 14 | 80 | |
| 15 | 31 | |
| 16 | 14 | |
| 17 | 146 | |
| 18 | 34 | |
| 19 | 24 |
About Amber Sprenger
Amber Sprenger is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Management Science and Operations Research and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 522 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (6 papers), Forecasting Techniques and Applications (4 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (104 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (139 citations) and Family Practice (22 citations). Amber Sprenger has collaborated with scholars based in United States, France and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Michael R. Dougherty, Rick P. Thomas, J. Isaiah Harbison, Robert O. Hartman, Nathan F. Dieckmann, Kenneth G. DeMarree, Sharona M. Atkins, Michael F. Bunting, Donald J. Bolger and Jared M. Novick. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Psychological Review and Journal of Experimental Psychology General.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.