Amber Sprenger

856 total citations
19 papers, 522 citations indexed

About

Amber Sprenger is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Management Science and Operations Research and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, Amber Sprenger has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 522 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in General Decision Sciences, 5 papers in Management Science and Operations Research and 4 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in Amber Sprenger's work include Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (6 papers), Forecasting Techniques and Applications (4 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (4 papers). Amber Sprenger is often cited by papers focused on Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (6 papers), Forecasting Techniques and Applications (4 papers) and Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (4 papers). Amber Sprenger collaborates with scholars based in United States, France and Australia. Amber Sprenger's co-authors include Michael R. Dougherty, Rick P. Thomas, J. Isaiah Harbison, Robert O. Hartman, Nathan F. Dieckmann, Kenneth G. DeMarree, Sharona M. Atkins, Michael F. Bunting, Donald J. Bolger and Jared M. Novick and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Psychological Review and Journal of Experimental Psychology General.

In The Last Decade

Amber Sprenger

17 papers receiving 496 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Amber Sprenger United States 10 153 139 127 104 94 19 522
Rick P. Thomas United States 13 139 0.9× 96 0.7× 132 1.0× 117 1.1× 60 0.6× 37 522
Jean-Paul Caverni France 9 140 0.9× 69 0.5× 130 1.0× 173 1.7× 119 1.3× 21 505
Benjamin M. Rottman United States 12 66 0.4× 68 0.5× 173 1.4× 85 0.8× 213 2.3× 49 572
Diana L. Young United States 7 208 1.4× 170 1.2× 43 0.3× 74 0.7× 58 0.6× 9 550
Ana M. Franco‐Watkins United States 12 110 0.7× 77 0.6× 55 0.4× 133 1.3× 78 0.8× 25 482
Anja Dieckmann Germany 12 92 0.6× 61 0.4× 76 0.6× 170 1.6× 53 0.6× 25 407
Linda M. Moxey United Kingdom 19 373 2.4× 364 2.6× 269 2.1× 134 1.3× 288 3.1× 35 963
Daniel Hausmann Switzerland 9 105 0.7× 74 0.5× 50 0.4× 101 1.0× 51 0.5× 12 447
Katrin Schulz Netherlands 14 110 0.7× 196 1.4× 361 2.8× 27 0.3× 91 1.0× 40 845
Bence Pálfi United Kingdom 10 127 0.8× 71 0.5× 26 0.2× 76 0.7× 44 0.5× 22 496

Countries citing papers authored by Amber Sprenger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Amber Sprenger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amber Sprenger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amber Sprenger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Amber Sprenger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amber Sprenger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amber Sprenger. The network helps show where Amber Sprenger may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amber Sprenger

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amber Sprenger. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amber Sprenger based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Amber Sprenger. Amber Sprenger is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
1.
2.
Sprenger, Amber, et al.. (2024). Surveys and Diaries and Scales, Oh My! A Critical Analysis of Household Food Waste Measurement. Sustainability. 16(3). 968–968. 4 indexed citations
3.
Branting, L. Karl, et al.. (2024). Initial assessment of the efficacy of food recovery policies in US States for increasing food donations and reducing waste. Waste Management. 176. 149–158. 8 indexed citations
4.
Leets, Laura, et al.. (2022). Promoting tree equity in Washington, D.C. Trees Forests and People. 7. 100209–100209. 9 indexed citations
5.
Leets, Laura, et al.. (2020). Effectiveness of nudges on small business tax compliance behavior. 3(2). 2 indexed citations
6.
Kirkpatrick, Shelley A., et al.. (2020). Development of an Organizational Agility Assessment for Government and Nonprofit Organizations. Academy of Management Proceedings. 2020(1). 10088–10088. 3 indexed citations
7.
Leets, Laura, et al.. (2020). Nudging Discharge Readiness With a Poster: A Sequential, Exploratory Mixed Methods Pilot Study of Patient Caregivers. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 7(6). 1341–1348. 1 indexed citations
8.
Kyllonen, Patrick C., Robert O. Hartman, Amber Sprenger, et al.. (2018). General fluid/inductive reasoning battery for a high-ability population. Behavior Research Methods. 51(2). 507–522. 11 indexed citations
9.
Hartman, Robert, Adam Beatty, Mark Lehner, et al.. (2018). Critical Analytic Thinking Skills: Do They Predict Job-Related Task Performance Above and Beyond General Intelligence?. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 1(4). 7 indexed citations
10.
Hartman, Robert O., et al.. (2017). Modeling Attitudes Toward Science: Development and Validation of the Credibility of Science Scale. Basic and Applied Social Psychology. 39(6). 358–371. 74 indexed citations
11.
Atkins, Sharona M., Amber Sprenger, Gregory J. H. Colflesh, et al.. (2014). Measuring Working Memory Is All Fun and Games. Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie). 61(6). 417–438. 30 indexed citations
12.
Sprenger, Amber, et al.. (2014). A memory-theoretic account of hypothesis generation and judgment and decision making. 85–106. 1 indexed citations
13.
Sprenger, Amber, et al.. (2013). When decision heuristics and science collide. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 21(2). 268–282. 43 indexed citations
14.
Sprenger, Amber, Sharona M. Atkins, Donald J. Bolger, et al.. (2013). Training working memory: Limits of transfer. Intelligence. 41(5). 638–663. 80 indexed citations
15.
Sprenger, Amber & Michael R. Dougherty. (2011). Generating and evaluating options for decision making: The impact of sequentially presented evidence.. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition. 38(3). 550–575. 14 indexed citations
16.
Sprenger, Amber, Michael R. Dougherty, Sharona M. Atkins, et al.. (2011). Implications of Cognitive Load for Hypothesis Generation and Probability Judgment. Frontiers in Psychology. 2. 129–129. 31 indexed citations
17.
Thomas, Rick P., Michael R. Dougherty, Amber Sprenger, & J. Isaiah Harbison. (2008). Diagnostic hypothesis generation and human judgment.. Psychological Review. 115(1). 155–185. 146 indexed citations
18.
Dougherty, Michael R. & Amber Sprenger. (2006). The influence of improper sets of information on judgment: How irrelevant information can bias judged probability.. Journal of Experimental Psychology General. 135(2). 262–281. 34 indexed citations
19.
Sprenger, Amber & Michael R. Dougherty. (2005). Differences between probability and frequency judgments: The role of individual differences in working memory capacity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 99(2). 202–211. 24 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Rick P. Thomas Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Jean-Paul Caverni Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Benjamin M. Rottman Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Diana L. Young Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ana M. Franco‐Watkins Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Anja Dieckmann Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Linda M. Moxey Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Daniel Hausmann Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Katrin Schulz Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Bence Pálfi
Rankless by CCL
2026