Ivana Janković
- Molecular Biology
- Genetics top 5%
- Food Science top 2%
- Nutrition and Dietetics top 5%
- Plant Science
- Co-authors
- Noah A. RosenbergEthan M. JewettZachary A. SzpiechMichael BoehnkeReinhold BrücknerSvetlana M. StamatovicFabrizio ArigoniRichard F. Keep
- Topics
- Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (6 papers)Probiotics and Fermented Foods (5 papers)Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology (5 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Biological ChemistrySHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaNature Reviews Genetics
- Partner nations
- SerbiaGermanySwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Ivana Janković
25 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 127
- Molecular Biology 635
- Genetics 450
- Food Science 374
- Nutrition and Dietetics 266
- Plant Science 104
Countries citing papers authored by Ivana Janković
This map shows the geographic impact of Ivana Janković's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ivana Janković with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ivana Janković more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Ivana Janković
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ivana Janković. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ivana Janković. The network helps show where Ivana Janković may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ivana Janković
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ivana Janković. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ivana Janković based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ivana Janković. Ivana Janković is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 18 | |
| 6 | 27 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 8 | |
| 9 | 385 | |
| 10 | 127 | |
| 11 | 159 | |
| 12 | 79 | |
| 13 | 18 | |
| 14 | 84 | |
| 15 | 95 | |
| 16 | Carbon catabolite repression by the catabolite control protein CcpA in Staphylococcus xylosus. | 18 |
| 17 | 99 | |
| 18 | 23 | |
| 19 | 32 | |
| 20 | 44 |
About Ivana Janković
Ivana Janković is a scholar working on Biotechnology, Genetics and Nutrition and Dietetics, having authored 25 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology (6 papers), Probiotics and Fermented Foods (5 papers) and Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Food Science (374 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (266 citations) and Genetics (450 citations). Ivana Janković has collaborated with scholars based in Serbia, Germany and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Noah A. Rosenberg, Ethan M. Jewett, Zachary A. Szpiech, Michael Boehnke, Reinhold Brückner, Svetlana M. Stamatovic, Fabrizio Arigoni, Richard F. Keep, Anuska V. Andjelkovic and Michael M. Wang. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biological Chemistry, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Nature Reviews Genetics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.