Nature Reviews Genetics

3.0k papers and 613.5k indexed citations

About

The 3.0k papers published in Nature Reviews Genetics in the last decades have received a total of 613.5k indexed citations. Papers published in Nature Reviews Genetics usually cover Molecular Biology (2.0k papers), Genetics (1.1k papers) and Plant Science (368 papers) specifically the topics of CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (404 papers), Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (332 papers) and RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (275 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Nature Reviews Genetics are Peter A. Jones, Manel Esteller, Michael L. Metzker, Albert-Ĺaszló Barabási, M Snyder, Zhong Wang, Gregory J. Hannon, Mark Gerstein, Lin He and Hans Ellegren.

In The Last Decade

Nature Reviews Genetics

2.7k papers receiving 600.2k citations

Countries where authors publish in Nature Reviews Genetics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Nature Reviews Genetics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Nature Reviews Genetics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nature Reviews Genetics more than expected).

Fields of papers published in Nature Reviews Genetics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Nature Reviews Genetics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Nature Reviews Genetics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026