Nature Reviews Genetics

2.9k papers and 582.2k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.9k papers published in Nature Reviews Genetics in the last decades have received a total of 582.2k indexed citations. Papers published in Nature Reviews Genetics usually cover Molecular Biology (2.0k papers), Genetics (1.0k papers) and Plant Science (361 papers) specifically the topics of CRISPR and Genetic Engineering (392 papers), Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (325 papers) and RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms (271 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Nature Reviews Genetics are Peter A. Jones, Manel Esteller, Michael L. Metzker, Albert‐László Barabási, Zhong Wang, Gregory J. Hannon, M Snyder, Mark Gerstein, Lin He and Witold Filipowicz.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Nature Reviews Genetics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Nature Reviews Genetics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Nature Reviews Genetics.

Countries where authors publish in Nature Reviews Genetics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Nature Reviews Genetics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Nature Reviews Genetics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nature Reviews Genetics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025