Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Accounting and the New Public Management: Instruments of Substantive Efficiency or a Rationalising Modernity?
1999297 citationsIrvine LapsleyFinancial Accountability and Managementprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Irvine Lapsley
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Irvine Lapsley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Irvine Lapsley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Irvine Lapsley more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Irvine Lapsley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Irvine Lapsley. The network helps show where Irvine Lapsley may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Irvine Lapsley
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Irvine Lapsley.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Irvine Lapsley based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Irvine Lapsley. Irvine Lapsley is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Bergström, Tomas & Irvine Lapsley. (2017). On the elusive nature of modernisation in government. Edinburgh Research Explorer. 119(1). 7–22.6 indexed citations
Arnaboldi, Michela & Irvine Lapsley. (2005). Activity Based Costing in Healthcare: A UK Case Study. Virtual Community of Pathological Anatomy (University of Castilla La Mancha). 10(1). 59–73.32 indexed citations
Paterson, Audrey & Irvine Lapsley. (2003). The Diffusion of Accounting Practices in the New 'Managerial' Public Sector. SSRN Electronic Journal.6 indexed citations
13.
Kurunmäki, Liisa, Irvine Lapsley, & Kath M. Melia. (2003). Accountingization v. Legitimation: A Comparative Study of the Use of Accounting Information in Intensive Care. SSRN Electronic Journal.2 indexed citations
Lapsley, Irvine, et al.. (2000). Accounting, Management and Organisational Change: A Comparative Study of Local Government. SSRN Electronic Journal.15 indexed citations
16.
Lapsley, Irvine, et al.. (1997). Explorations in financial control : essays in honour of John Perrin.2 indexed citations
17.
Lapsley, Irvine & Falconer Mitchell. (1996). Accounting and performance measurement : issues in the private and public sectors.40 indexed citations
18.
Clark, Chris & Irvine Lapsley. (1996). Planning and costing community care.5 indexed citations
19.
Lapsley, Irvine, et al.. (1993). Purchasing palliative care: availability and cost implications.. PubMed. 51(6). 370–84.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.