Public Money & Management

2.2k papers and 25.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.2k papers published in Public Money & Management in the last decades have received a total of 25.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Public Money & Management usually cover Public Administration (587 papers), Political Science and International Relations (520 papers) and Strategy and Management (383 papers) specifically the topics of Public Policy and Administration Research (556 papers), Accounting and Organizational Management (206 papers) and Local Government Finance and Decentralization (195 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Public Money & Management are Jean Hartley, Christopher Hood, George A. Boyne, Patrick Dunleavy, Rosemary Deem, Christopher Pollitt, James L. Chan, Erik‐Hans Klijn, Stephen P. Osborne and John Stewart.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Public Money & Management

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Public Money & Management. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Public Money & Management.

Countries where authors publish in Public Money & Management

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Public Money & Management. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Public Money & Management with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Public Money & Management more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025