Injazz Chen

10 papers receiving 329 citations

Peers

Injazz Chen
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Information Systems and Management 183
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 232
  • Marketing 132
  • Management Information Systems 76
  • Strategy and Management 72
Replace Wen‐Bao Lin with:
Wen‐Bao Lin Taiwan
Mona Jami Pour Iran
G. Tomas United States
Dong Kyoon Yoo United States
Tong Che China
Fernando Bins Luce Brazil
Mika Yrjölä Finland
Jun Kang China
Malte Geib Switzerland
Kevin L. Webb United States
Injazz Chen relative to Wen‐Bao Lin Taiwan Wen‐Bao Lin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Wen‐Bao Lin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Injazz Chen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Injazz Chen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Injazz Chen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Injazz Chen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Injazz Chen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Injazz Chen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Injazz Chen. The network helps show where Injazz Chen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 13 scholars most cited alongside Injazz Chen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Injazz Chen Line = papers co-authored together Injazz Chen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 2002290
2 199543
3 200124
4 199620
5 199117
6 19888
7 19927
8 20024
9 20113
10 19891

About Injazz Chen

Injazz Chen is a scholar working on Management Information Systems, Information Systems and Management, Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Control and Systems Engineering and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 10 papers that have together received 417 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Technology Adoption and User Behaviour (3 papers), Supply Chain and Inventory Management (2 papers), Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms (2 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (2 papers), Optimization and Mathematical Programming (2 papers), Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (2 papers), Consumer Retail Behavior Studies (2 papers) and Energy, Environment, Economic Growth (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Information Systems and Management (183 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (232 citations), Marketing (132 citations), Management Information Systems (76 citations) and Strategy and Management (72 citations). Injazz Chen has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Taiwan. Frequent co-authors include Walter Wymer, Atul Gupta, Chen‐Hua Chung, Kuanchin Chen, Peter Yang, Richard C. Dorf, Matthew J. Liberatore, William G. Sullivan, James M. Reeve and P. L. Primrose. Their work appears in journals such as European Journal of Operational Research, Journal of Computer Information Systems, The Journal of Creative Behavior, International Journal of Service Industry Management and Computers & Industrial Engineering.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact