Ingo Pies

90 papers receiving 997 citations

Peers

Ingo Pies
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
  • Business and International Management 78
  • Strategy and Management 443
  • Marketing 254
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 204
  • Information Systems and Management 136
Replace Markus Beckmann with:
Markus Beckmann Germany
André Nijhof Netherlands
María Alejandra González-Pérez Colombia
Flore Bridoux Netherlands
Stefan Hielscher Germany
Marco Bellucci Italy
Peter S. Hofman China
Deepa Aravind United States
Barry A. Colbert Canada
R. Edward Freeman United States
Ingo Pies relative to Markus Beckmann Germany Markus Beckmann's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Markus Beckmann · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ingo Pies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ingo Pies's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ingo Pies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ingo Pies more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ingo Pies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ingo Pies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ingo Pies. The network helps show where Ingo Pies may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Ingo Pies, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ingo Pies Line = papers co-authored together Ingo Pies links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 111 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012143
2 2009108
3 200979
4 201354
5 202146
6 201542
7 201929
8 201429
9 202326
10 202026
11 201725
12 201224
13 202024
14 201623
15 201623
16 201523
17 202219
18 201319
19 201817
20 202316

About Ingo Pies

Ingo Pies is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics, Strategy and Management, Information Systems and Management and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, having authored 111 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Economic and Social Issues (21 papers), Economic Theory and Institutions (16 papers), Ethics in Business and Education (15 papers), Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting (9 papers), Management and Organizational Studies (8 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (7 papers), Innovation and Socioeconomic Development (6 papers) and Sustainable Supply Chain Management (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Business and International Management (78 citations), Strategy and Management (443 citations), Marketing (254 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (204 citations) and Information Systems and Management (136 citations). Ingo Pies has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, South Korea and United States. Frequent co-authors include Stefan Hielscher, Markus Beckmann, Vladislav Valentinov, Matthias Georg Will, Karl Homann, Thomas Glauben, Philipp Schreck, Steffen Roth, Robert Reinhardt and Martin Petrick. Their work appears in journals such as Business Ethics Quarterly, Journal of Industrial Ecology, Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Business Strategy and the Environment and VOLUNTAS International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact