Ines Devlieger

10 papers receiving 453 citations

Peers

Ines Devlieger
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
  • Management Science and Operations Research 95
  • Statistics and Probability 62
  • Clinical Psychology 131
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 75
  • Applied Psychology 19
Replace Ernest C. Davenport with:
Ernest C. Davenport United States
Anne Corinne Huggins‐Manley United States
Chunhua Cao United States
Melinda R. Hess United States
Carmen Ximénez Spain
Prathiba Natesan United States
Kuan‐Yu Jin Hong Kong
Ulf Kroehne Germany
Hairong Song United States
Chi Chang United States
Ines Devlieger relative to Ernest C. Davenport United States Ernest C. Davenport's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.1×
Ernest C. Davenport · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ines Devlieger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ines Devlieger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ines Devlieger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ines Devlieger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ines Devlieger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ines Devlieger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ines Devlieger. The network helps show where Ines Devlieger may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Ines Devlieger, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ines Devlieger Line = papers co-authored together Ines Devlieger links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 2015125
2 2017113
3 201558
4 202151
5 202226
6 201926
7 201921
8 202219
9 202219
10 20226

About Ines Devlieger

Ines Devlieger is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Computer Networks and Communications, Sociology and Political Science, Management Science and Operations Research and Education, having authored 10 papers that have together received 464 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Migration, Health and Trauma (5 papers), Racial and Ethnic Identity Research (4 papers), Advanced Statistical Modeling Techniques (4 papers), Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (4 papers), Education and experiences of immigrants and refugees (3 papers), Migration and Labor Dynamics (1 paper), Child Development and Digital Technology (1 paper) and Digital literacy in education (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Management Science and Operations Research (95 citations), Statistics and Probability (62 citations), Clinical Psychology (131 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (75 citations) and Applied Psychology (19 citations). Ines Devlieger has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Sweden and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Yves Rosseel, Axel Mayer, Koen Aesaert, Johan van Braak, Ruben Vanderlinde, Jo Tondeur, Daniël Van Nijlen, Ilse Derluyn, Elisa Pfeiffer and Ine Lietaert. Their work appears in journals such as Educational and Psychological Measurement, Computers & Education, Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health, Journal of Youth and Adolescence and Multivariate Behavioral Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact