Ian Churcher

5.8k citations
42 papers · 3.4k indexed · 2 hit papers · h-index 26

Impact in

Papers in

Ian Churcher

41 papers receiving 3.3k citations

Hit Papers

Return to Flatland 2025 · 18 citations
1820182026202020232505007501000

Peers

Ian Churcher
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Organic Chemistry 1.8k
  • Pharmaceutical Science 163
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 376
  • Pharmacology 358
  • Molecular Biology 1.4k
Replace Roland E. Dolle with:
Roland E. Dolle United States
Milton L. Brown United States
Yungen Xu China
Chris P. Miller United States
Antonia F. Stepan United States
Douglas S. Johnson United States
Paul V. Fish United Kingdom
Joseph M. Salvino United States
William Leister United States
Joachim Rudolph United States
Ian Churcher relative to Roland E. Dolle United States Roland E. Dolle's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.8×
Roland E. Dolle · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ian Churcher

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ian Churcher's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ian Churcher with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ian Churcher more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ian Churcher

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ian Churcher. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ian Churcher. The network helps show where Ian Churcher may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ian Churcher, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ian Churcher Line = papers co-authored together Ian Churcher links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1
Return to Flatland
Hit paper breakdown →
202518
2 202149
3 202157
4 202067
5 2018121
6 201752
7 201675
8 201627
9 201610
10 20134
11 201311
12 2012342
13 201120
14 201130
15 200664
16 2006114
17 200630
18 200540
19 2004144
20 199814

About Ian Churcher

Ian Churcher is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Organic Chemistry, Physiology and Pharmacology, having authored 42 papers that have together received 3.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (10 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (10 papers), Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases (9 papers), Chemical Synthesis and Analysis (8 papers), Catalytic C–H Functionalization Methods (6 papers), Protein Degradation and Inhibitors (6 papers), Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways (6 papers) and Synthesis and Catalytic Reactions (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Organic Chemistry (1.8k citations), Pharmaceutical Science (163 citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (376 citations), Pharmacology (358 citations) and Molecular Biology (1.4k citations). Ian Churcher has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Ireland. Frequent co-authors include Andrew W. Thomas, David C. Rees, David M. Wilson, Luis C. Misal Castro, Anthony Wood, David C. Blakemore, Alan Nadin, Channa K. Hattotuwagama, Dirk Beher and Mark S. Shearman. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, Chemical Communications, Journal of Biological Chemistry, Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics and Journal of the American Chemical Society.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026