Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Struggle for the American Curriculum, 1893-1958
Countries citing papers authored by Herbert M. Kliebard
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Herbert M. Kliebard's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Herbert M. Kliebard with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Herbert M. Kliebard more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Herbert M. Kliebard
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Herbert M. Kliebard. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Herbert M. Kliebard. The network helps show where Herbert M. Kliebard may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Herbert M. Kliebard
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Herbert M. Kliebard.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Herbert M. Kliebard based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Herbert M. Kliebard. Herbert M. Kliebard is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Kliebard, Herbert M.. (2011). Os princípios de Tyler. Curriculo sem Fronteiras. 11(2). 23–35.5 indexed citations
3.
Kliebard, Herbert M. & Barry M. Franklin. (2000). Curriculum & consequence : Herbert M. Kliebard and the promise of schooling. Teachers College Press eBooks.11 indexed citations
4.
Kliebard, Herbert M.. (1995). Why History of Education?. The Journal of Educational Research. 88(4). 194–199.8 indexed citations
5.
Kliebard, Herbert M.. (1995). The Tyler Rationale revisited. Journal of Curriculum Studies. 27(1). 81–88.33 indexed citations
Kliebard, Herbert M.. (1994). "That Evil Genius of the Negro Race": Thomas Jesse Jones and Educational Reform.. Journal of curriculum and supervision. 10(1). 5–20.6 indexed citations
Kliebard, Herbert M.. (1985). What Happened to American Schooling in the First Part of the Twentieth Century. Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education. 86(6). 1–22.3 indexed citations
Bellack, Arno A. & Herbert M. Kliebard. (1977). Curriculum and evaluation. Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec (Québec government).57 indexed citations
Kliebard, Herbert M.. (1976). Curriculum Past and Curriculum Present.. Educational leadership.3 indexed citations
17.
Kazamias, Andreas Μ., et al.. (1974). Teacher, student, and society : perspectives on education. Medical Entomology and Zoology.1 indexed citations
18.
Kliebard, Herbert M.. (1970). The Tyler Rationale. The School Review. 78(2). 259–272.60 indexed citations
19.
Kliebard, Herbert M.. (1969). Religion and education in America : a documentary history.3 indexed citations
20.
Bellack, Arno A., Herbert M. Kliebard, Ronald T. Hyman, & Frank L. Smith. (1963). The language of the classroom. Medical Entomology and Zoology.442 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.