H.A.M. Wilke

508 total citations
10 papers, 392 citations indexed

About

H.A.M. Wilke is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Safety Research. According to data from OpenAlex, H.A.M. Wilke has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 392 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Social Psychology, 4 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 3 papers in Safety Research. Recurrent topics in H.A.M. Wilke's work include Cultural Differences and Values (3 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (3 papers) and Social and Intergroup Psychology (2 papers). H.A.M. Wilke is often cited by papers focused on Cultural Differences and Values (3 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (3 papers) and Social and Intergroup Psychology (2 papers). H.A.M. Wilke collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands. H.A.M. Wilke's co-authors include Christel G. Rutte, David M. Messick, Kees van den Bos, E. Allan Lind, Roel W. Meertens, Arjaan P. Wit, A. J. Nederhof, Wim B. G. Liebrand, Jan Bruins and Barbara van Knippenberg and has published in prestigious journals such as European Journal of Social Psychology, Group Processes & Intergroup Relations and Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS).

In The Last Decade

H.A.M. Wilke

10 papers receiving 358 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
H.A.M. Wilke Netherlands	6	254	185	120	73	40	10	392
Matthijs Poppe Netherlands	12	231 0.9×	141 0.8×	139 1.2×	56 0.8×	38 0.9×	18	372
Norman Cotterell United States	4	147 0.6×	52 0.3×	109 0.9×	196 2.7×	14 0.3×	5	337
Janusz Grzelak Poland	5	186 0.7×	99 0.5×	85 0.7×	15 0.2×	26 0.7×	11	305
Jennifer Carson Marr United States	9	204 0.8×	54 0.3×	132 1.1×	156 2.1×	24 0.6×	17	399
Lukas Neville Canada	9	203 0.8×	35 0.2×	92 0.8×	136 1.9×	26 0.7×	12	354
Keith G. Allred United States	6	348 1.4×	54 0.3×	233 1.9×	115 1.6×	15 0.4×	7	465
Julian Jake Zlatev United States	11	148 0.6×	53 0.3×	79 0.7×	64 0.9×	43 1.1×	18	356
Sabrina Deutsch Salamon Canada	4	153 0.6×	37 0.2×	145 1.2×	264 3.6×	22 0.6×	7	446
Adi Amit Israel	9	199 0.8×	29 0.2×	160 1.3×	62 0.8×	41 1.0×	21	372
Deshani B. Ganegoda Australia	9	101 0.4×	37 0.2×	114 0.9×	165 2.3×	43 1.1×	15	307

Countries citing papers authored by H.A.M. Wilke

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of H.A.M. Wilke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by H.A.M. Wilke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites H.A.M. Wilke more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by H.A.M. Wilke

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by H.A.M. Wilke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by H.A.M. Wilke. The network helps show where H.A.M. Wilke may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of H.A.M. Wilke

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of H.A.M. Wilke. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of H.A.M. Wilke based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with H.A.M. Wilke. H.A.M. Wilke is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Bos, Kees van den, E. Allan Lind, & H.A.M. Wilke. (2001). The psychology of procedural and distributive justice viewed from the perspective of fairness heuristic theory. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 49–66. 136 indexed citations

2.

Knippenberg, Barbara van, et al.. (1999). The use of soft and hard influence tactics in cooperative task groups. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. 2. 1 indexed citations

3.

Meertens, Roel W., A. J. Nederhof, & H.A.M. Wilke. (1992). Social psychological research in The Netherlands, 1980‐1988. European Journal of Social Psychology. 22(1). 93–100. 7 indexed citations

4.

Meertens, Roel W., A. J. Nederhof, & H.A.M. Wilke. (1990). Social psychology research in the Netherlands in the period 1980 superscript 1988 / Sociaal-psychologisch onderzoek in Nederland in de periode 1980-1988. UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam). 45(4). 145–155. 1 indexed citations

5.

Wit, Arjaan P., et al.. (1989). Attribution of leadership in a resource management situation. European Journal of Social Psychology. 19(4). 327–338. 10 indexed citations

6.

Wilke, H.A.M., David M. Messick, & Christel G. Rutte. (1986). Experimental social dilemmas. P. Lang eBooks. 163 indexed citations

7.

Wilke, H.A.M., et al.. (1986). Conservative coalitions: An expectation states approach. European Journal of Social Psychology. 16(1). 51–63. 2 indexed citations

8.

Wilke, H.A.M., et al.. (1986). Equity and individual preferences in an MDG. European Journal of Social Psychology. 16(2). 131–148. 3 indexed citations

9.

Rutte, Christel G. & H.A.M. Wilke. (1985). Preference for decision structures in a social dilemma situation. European Journal of Social Psychology. 15(3). 367–370. 26 indexed citations

10.

Wilke, H.A.M., et al.. (1984). Social dilemmas and leadership. European Journal of Social Psychology. 14(1). 105–121. 43 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact