Hallie Preskill

3.1k total citations
63 papers, 1.9k citations indexed

About

Hallie Preskill is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, General Health Professions and Applied Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Hallie Preskill has authored 63 papers receiving a total of 1.9k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 45 papers in Management Science and Operations Research, 19 papers in General Health Professions and 12 papers in Applied Psychology. Recurrent topics in Hallie Preskill's work include Evaluation and Performance Assessment (45 papers), Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation (12 papers) and Public Policy and Administration Research (12 papers). Hallie Preskill is often cited by papers focused on Evaluation and Performance Assessment (45 papers), Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation (12 papers) and Public Policy and Administration Research (12 papers). Hallie Preskill collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and Bangladesh. Hallie Preskill's co-authors include Rosalie T. Torres, Darlene Russ‐Eft, Tessie Tzavaras Catsambas, Valerie J. Caracelli, Stewart I. Donaldson, Jennifer C. Greene, Gary T. Henry, Kathleen R. Miner, Patricia P. Rieker and Michael Baizerman and has published in prestigious journals such as Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, Educational leadership and Evaluation and Program Planning.

In The Last Decade

Hallie Preskill

58 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Hallie Preskill United States 22 1.2k 542 424 406 332 63 1.9k
Ernest R. House United States 23 1.3k 1.1× 402 0.7× 1.1k 2.6× 341 0.8× 469 1.4× 143 2.7k
Jody Fitzpatrick United States 15 454 0.4× 245 0.5× 560 1.3× 155 0.4× 159 0.5× 49 1.5k
Michael Huberman Canada 27 281 0.2× 347 0.6× 1.2k 2.9× 127 0.3× 232 0.7× 81 2.5k
Darlene Russ‐Eft United States 21 200 0.2× 163 0.3× 290 0.7× 51 0.1× 79 0.2× 90 1.5k
Nathan Caplan United States 15 317 0.3× 395 0.7× 296 0.7× 158 0.4× 68 0.2× 29 1.8k
Carolyn J. Hill United States 18 153 0.1× 209 0.4× 933 2.2× 162 0.4× 99 0.3× 34 1.9k
Joseph T. Banas United States 5 110 0.1× 324 0.6× 147 0.3× 68 0.2× 92 0.3× 5 1.9k
Don Houston Australia 13 136 0.1× 162 0.3× 365 0.9× 305 0.8× 40 0.1× 32 1.4k
Wendell L. French United States 14 202 0.2× 129 0.2× 133 0.3× 85 0.2× 49 0.1× 31 1.3k
Sharon Conley United States 24 114 0.1× 276 0.5× 1.1k 2.7× 73 0.2× 245 0.7× 76 2.3k

Countries citing papers authored by Hallie Preskill

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Hallie Preskill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Hallie Preskill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Hallie Preskill more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Hallie Preskill

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Hallie Preskill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Hallie Preskill. The network helps show where Hallie Preskill may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Hallie Preskill

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Hallie Preskill. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Hallie Preskill based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Hallie Preskill. Hallie Preskill is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Preskill, Hallie. (2018). The Value of Lived Experience. New Directions for Evaluation. 2018(157). 89–91. 3 indexed citations
2.
Preskill, Hallie, et al.. (2009). Insights into Evaluation Capacity Building: Motivations, Strategies, Outcomes, and Lessons Learned. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation. 23(3). 147–174. 27 indexed citations
3.
Preskill, Hallie, et al.. (2008). A Multidisciplinary Model of Evaluation Capacity Building. American Journal of Evaluation. 29(4). 443–459. 260 indexed citations
4.
Preskill, Hallie & Jennifer Martineau. (2004). Learning from evaluation: A conversation with Hallie Preskill. Leadership in Action. 23(6). 9–12.
5.
Russ‐Eft, Darlene & Hallie Preskill. (2004). In Search of the Holy Grail: Return on Investment Evaluation in Human Resource Development. Advances in Developing Human Resources. 7(1). 71–85. 40 indexed citations
6.
Preskill, Hallie, et al.. (2003). An Exploratory Study of Process Use: Findings and Implications for Future Research. American Journal of Evaluation. 24(4). 423–442. 63 indexed citations
7.
Preskill, Hallie, et al.. (2003). An overview of appreciative inquiry in evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation. 2003(100). 5–22. 113 indexed citations
8.
Torres, Rosalie T. & Hallie Preskill. (2001). Evaluation and Organizational Learning: Past, Present, and Future. American Journal of Evaluation. 22(3). 387–395. 105 indexed citations
9.
Zuckerman, Barry, Hallie Preskill, & Corey Levenson. (2001). An Evaluation of I Can Cope: Insights into Program Design and Implementation. Cancer Practice. 9(s1). S31–6. 3 indexed citations
10.
Caracelli, Valerie J. & Hallie Preskill. (2000). The expanding scope of evaluation use. Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec (Québec government). 41 indexed citations
11.
Caracelli, Valerie J. & Hallie Preskill. (2000). Editors' notes. New Directions for Evaluation. 2000(88). 1–4. 1 indexed citations
12.
Preskill, Hallie & Rosalie T. Torres. (2000). The learning dimension of evaluation use. New Directions for Evaluation. 2000(88). 25–37. 69 indexed citations
13.
Preskill, Hallie & Valerie J. Caracelli. (1997). Current and developing conceptions of use: Evaluation use TIG survey results. Evaluation Practice. 18(3). 209–225. 65 indexed citations
14.
Torres, Rosalie T., et al.. (1997). Communicating and reporting: Practices and concerns of internal and external evaluators. Evaluation Practice. 18(2). 105–125. 18 indexed citations
15.
Torres, Rosalie T., et al.. (1996). Evaluation Strategies for Communicating and Reporting: Enhancing Learning in Organizations. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 54 indexed citations
16.
Larson, Colleen L. & Hallie Preskill. (1991). Organizations in transition : opportunities and challenges for evaluation. Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec (Québec government). 3 indexed citations
17.
Preskill, Hallie. (1991). A comparison of data collection methods for assessing training needs. Human Resource Development Quarterly. 2(2). 143–155. 4 indexed citations
18.
Preskill, Hallie. (1989). Adult Learning and the Teaching of Evaluation: A Study of an Experiential Learning Project.. 43(4). 208–11. 1 indexed citations
19.
Preskill, Hallie, et al.. (1982). Vocational Educator Involvement in Individualized Programming for Handicapped Students.. Korean Society for the Study of Vocational Education. 7(3). 11–25. 1 indexed citations
20.
Raths, James & Hallie Preskill. (1982). Research Synthesis on Summative Evaluation of Teaching.. Educational leadership. 39(4). 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026