Gülden Ülkümen

17 papers receiving 437 citations

Peers

Gülden Ülkümen
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
  • General Decision Sciences 168
  • Applied Psychology 106
  • Marketing 85
  • Management Science and Operations Research 56
  • Social Psychology 87
Replace Liat Hadar with:
Liat Hadar United States
X. T. Wang China
Marc Scholten Portugal
Dalia L. Diab United States
Christoph Ungemach United States
Raffaëlla Misuraca Italy
Fabio Tufano United Kingdom
Rod Duclos United States
Julia Nafziger Denmark
Promothesh Chatterjee United States
Gülden Ülkümen relative to Liat Hadar United States Liat Hadar's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Liat Hadar · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Gülden Ülkümen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gülden Ülkümen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gülden Ülkümen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gülden Ülkümen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gülden Ülkümen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gülden Ülkümen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gülden Ülkümen. The network helps show where Gülden Ülkümen may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 14 scholars most cited alongside Gülden Ülkümen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Gülden Ülkümen Line = papers co-authored together Gülden Ülkümen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 2011115
2 200886
3 201177
4 201664
5 201640
6 201626
7 201012
8 202311
9 20228
10 20175
11 20164
12
Influencing feature price tradeoff decisions in CBC experiments
20093
13
Will I Spend More in 12 Months or a Year? The Effect of Ease of Estimation and Confidence on Budget Estimates
20082
14 20062
15 20202
16
The Effect of Default Time Units on Budget Estimation
20141
17 20121
18 20201

About Gülden Ülkümen

Gülden Ülkümen is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and Marketing, having authored 18 papers that have together received 460 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (13 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (5 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (3 papers), Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction (2 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers), Housing Market and Economics (2 papers), Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (2 papers) and Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (168 citations), Applied Psychology (106 citations), Marketing (85 citations), Management Science and Operations Research (56 citations) and Social Psychology (87 citations). Gülden Ülkümen has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Craig R. Fox, Amar Cheema, Vicki G. Morwitz, Manoj Thomas, Bertram F. Malle, David Tannenbaum, Lisa A. Cavanaugh, Deborah J. MacInnis, Amitav Chakravarti and Carsten Erner. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Marketing Research, Management Science, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Thinking & Reasoning and Journal of Experimental Psychology General.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact