Graeme Porte

948 total citations
15 papers, 546 citations indexed

About

Graeme Porte is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Language and Linguistics and Artificial Intelligence. According to data from OpenAlex, Graeme Porte has authored 15 papers receiving a total of 546 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Literature and Literary Theory, 8 papers in Language and Linguistics and 2 papers in Artificial Intelligence. Recurrent topics in Graeme Porte's work include EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (7 papers), Second Language Learning and Teaching (5 papers) and Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (4 papers). Graeme Porte is often cited by papers focused on EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning (7 papers), Second Language Learning and Teaching (5 papers) and Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (4 papers). Graeme Porte collaborates with scholars based in Spain and United Kingdom. Graeme Porte's co-authors include Kevin McManus and Keith Richards and has published in prestigious journals such as System, Journal of Second Language Writing and ELT Journal.

In The Last Decade

Graeme Porte

15 papers receiving 465 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Graeme Porte Spain 11 347 255 251 139 90 15 546
April Ginther United States 11 367 1.1× 280 1.1× 314 1.3× 178 1.3× 131 1.5× 24 641
Hossein Farhady Türkiye 10 342 1.0× 218 0.9× 199 0.8× 246 1.8× 52 0.6× 19 630
Tineke Brunfaut United Kingdom 13 366 1.1× 191 0.7× 361 1.4× 192 1.4× 105 1.2× 33 683
Greta Gorsuch United States 14 494 1.4× 290 1.1× 379 1.5× 201 1.4× 54 0.6× 36 791
James E. Purpura United States 9 424 1.2× 274 1.1× 343 1.4× 236 1.7× 55 0.6× 15 660
Xun Yan United States 14 278 0.8× 214 0.8× 183 0.7× 285 2.1× 78 0.9× 48 578
Carolyn E. Turner Canada 13 352 1.0× 239 0.9× 172 0.7× 202 1.5× 29 0.3× 24 520
Luke Harding United Kingdom 12 331 1.0× 252 1.0× 198 0.8× 299 2.2× 52 0.6× 39 648
Gi‐Pyo Park South Korea 10 449 1.3× 269 1.1× 253 1.0× 199 1.4× 22 0.2× 17 660
Carol Rinnert Japan 13 480 1.4× 433 1.7× 248 1.0× 220 1.6× 66 0.7× 21 701

Countries citing papers authored by Graeme Porte

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Graeme Porte's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Graeme Porte with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Graeme Porte more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Graeme Porte

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Graeme Porte. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Graeme Porte. The network helps show where Graeme Porte may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Graeme Porte

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Graeme Porte. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Graeme Porte based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Graeme Porte. Graeme Porte is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
1.
Porte, Graeme & Kevin McManus. (2018). Doing Replication Research in Applied Linguistics. 98 indexed citations
2.
Porte, Graeme. (2012). Replication research in applied linguistics. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 142 indexed citations
3.
Porte, Graeme & Keith Richards. (2012). Focus article: Replication in second language writing research. Journal of Second Language Writing. 21(3). 284–293. 46 indexed citations
4.
Porte, Graeme. (2010). Appraising Research in Second Language Learning: A practical approach to critical analysis of quantitative research. Second edition. 2 indexed citations
5.
Porte, Graeme. (2010). Appraising Research in Second Language Learning. 15 indexed citations
6.
Porte, Graeme. (2003). Selected research published in Spain 1999–2002. Language Teaching. 36(2). 110–119. 3 indexed citations
7.
Porte, Graeme. (2002). Appraising Research in Second Language Learning. 16 indexed citations
8.
Porte, Graeme. (2002). Appraising Research in Second Language Learning: A practical approach to critical analysis of quantitative research. TU Digital Collections (Thammasat University). 37 indexed citations
9.
Porte, Graeme. (2001). Losing sight of errors: the effects of typographical conditions on error salience in L2 proof-reading. System. 29(1). 137–148. 3 indexed citations
10.
Porte, Graeme. (1999). Where to Draw the Red line: Error Toleration of Native and Non‐Native EFL Faculty. Foreign Language Annals. 32(4). 426–434. 21 indexed citations
11.
Porte, Graeme. (1999). English as a forgotten language. ELT Journal. 53(1). 28–35. 11 indexed citations
12.
Porte, Graeme. (1997). The etiology of poor second language writing: the influence of perceived teacher preferences on second language revision strategies. Journal of Second Language Writing. 6(1). 61–78. 49 indexed citations
13.
Porte, Graeme. (1996). When writing fails: How academic context and past learning experiences shape revision. System. 24(1). 107–116. 45 indexed citations
14.
Porte, Graeme. (1995). Writing wrongs: copying as a strategy for underachieving EFL writers. ELT Journal. 49(2). 144–151. 9 indexed citations
15.
Porte, Graeme. (1988). Poor language learners and their strategies for dealing with new vocabulary. ELT Journal. 42(3). 167–172. 49 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026