Glenys Parry
- Clinical Psychology top 1%
- Social Psychology top 2%
- General Health Professions top 2%
- Applied Psychology top 1%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 2%
- Co-authors
- Eva KaltenthalerCatherine BeverleyJohn BrazierMichael FerriterIndra TumurDiana PapaioannouMichael BarkhamGillian E. Hardy
- Topics
- Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (22 papers)Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (18 papers)Mental Health Research Topics (12 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesQatar
In The Last Decade
Glenys Parry
76 papers receiving 2.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 122
- Clinical Psychology 1.4k
- Social Psychology 700
- General Health Professions 682
- Applied Psychology 579
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 512
Countries citing papers authored by Glenys Parry
This map shows the geographic impact of Glenys Parry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Glenys Parry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Glenys Parry more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Glenys Parry
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Glenys Parry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Glenys Parry. The network helps show where Glenys Parry may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Glenys Parry
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Glenys Parry. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Glenys Parry based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Glenys Parry. Glenys Parry is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 7 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 47 | |
| 5 | 141 | |
| 6 | 37 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 28 | |
| 9 | 15 | |
| 10 | 22 | |
| 11 | 104 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | 83 | |
| 14 | 155 | |
| 15 | 12 | |
| 16 | 17 | |
| 17 | 112 | |
| 18 | A cognitive analytic framework for understanding and managing problematic frequent attendance in primary care | 5 |
| 19 | 80 | |
| 20 | 25 |
About Glenys Parry
Glenys Parry is a scholar working on Medical Terminology, Clinical Psychology and Applied Psychology, having authored 76 papers that have together received 3.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (22 papers), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (18 papers) and Mental Health Research Topics (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (579 citations), Clinical Psychology (1.4k citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (512 citations). Glenys Parry has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Qatar. Frequent co-authors include Eva Kaltenthaler, Catherine Beverley, John Brazier, Michael Ferriter, Indra Tumur, Diana Papaioannou, Michael Barkham, Gillian E. Hardy, Kim Dent‐Brown and Cindy Cooper. Their work appears in journals such as The British Journal of Psychiatry, Journal of Affective Disorders and Frontiers in Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.