Anna‐Marie Jones
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Philosophy top 2%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Co-authors
- Mark HaywardClara StraussNeil ThomasCassie M. HazellKate CavanaghHugo CritchleySarah N. GarfinkelLisa Quadt
- Topics
- Schizophrenia research and treatment (15 papers)Mental Health and Psychiatry (12 papers)Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (9 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomSpainAustralia
In The Last Decade
Anna‐Marie Jones
54 papers receiving 806 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
- Psychiatry and Mental health 399
- Clinical Psychology 305
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 191
- Philosophy 140
- Cognitive Neuroscience 139
Countries citing papers authored by Anna‐Marie Jones
This map shows the geographic impact of Anna‐Marie Jones's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anna‐Marie Jones with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anna‐Marie Jones more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Anna‐Marie Jones
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anna‐Marie Jones. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anna‐Marie Jones. The network helps show where Anna‐Marie Jones may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anna‐Marie Jones
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anna‐Marie Jones. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anna‐Marie Jones based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anna‐Marie Jones. Anna‐Marie Jones is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 69 | |
| 11 | 21 | |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | Police Detentions of the Mentally ill in Public Places: a Multi-Method Approach to Reveal the Complexity of Factors in Section 136 use of the Mental Health Act in Sussex | 1 |
| 15 | 19 | |
| 16 | 50 | |
| 17 | 34 | |
| 18 | 11 | |
| 19 | 83 | |
| 20 | Popular participation in community health programmes. | 2 |
About Anna‐Marie Jones
Anna‐Marie Jones is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Philosophy and Clinical Psychology, having authored 57 papers that have together received 816 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (15 papers), Mental Health and Psychiatry (12 papers) and Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (399 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (191 citations) and Clinical Psychology (305 citations). Anna‐Marie Jones has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Spain and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Mark Hayward, Clara Strauss, Neil Thomas, Cassie M. Hazell, Kate Cavanagh, Hugo Critchley, Sarah N. Garfinkel, Lisa Quadt, Lyn Ellett and David Kingdon. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Hepatology and British Journal of Cancer.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.