Richard de Visser
- Gender Studies top 0.2%
- Gender Roles and Identity Studies 20
- Gender, Feminism, and Media 19
- Clinical Psychology top 0.5%
- Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology 31
- Applied Psychology top 1%
- Behavioral Health and Interventions 25
- General Health Professions top 0.5%
- Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health 51
- Social Psychology top 1%
- LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy 18
-
- Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes 29
-
- Sex work and related issues 25
- Co-authors
- Anthony M. A. SmithJuliet RichtersChris RisselAndrew E. GrulichJonathan A. SmithElizabeth McDonnellJudy M. SimpsonDominic Conroy
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaPortugal
In The Last Decade
Richard de Visser
178 papers receiving 6.4k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 148
- Gender Studies 1.3k
- Clinical Psychology 2.3k
- Applied Psychology 523
- General Health Professions 2.1k
- Social Psychology 1.2k
Countries citing papers authored by Richard de Visser
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard de Visser's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard de Visser with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard de Visser more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard de Visser
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard de Visser. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard de Visser. The network helps show where Richard de Visser may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Richard de Visser, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 5 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 0 | |
| 6 | 2022 | 0 | |
| 7 | 2021 | 6 | |
| 8 | 2019 | 10 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 40 | |
| 10 | Perceived barriers to accessing mental health services among black and minority ethnic (BME) communities: a qualitative study in Southeast Englandbreakdown → | 2016 | 247 |
| 11 | 2014 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2014 | 19 | |
| 13 | 2013 | 30 | |
| 14 | Psychology in medical curricula: "need to know" or "nice to know"? | 2009 | 8 |
| 15 | 2004 | 23 | |
| 16 | 2003 | 73 | |
| 17 | 2003 | 56 | |
| 18 | 2003 | 41 | |
| 19 | 2003 | 113 | |
| 20 | 2003 | 9 |
About Richard de Visser
Richard de Visser is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Gender Studies and General Health Professions, having authored 187 papers that have together received 6.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (51 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (31 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (29 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (25 papers), Sex work and related issues (25 papers), Gender Roles and Identity Studies (20 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (19 papers) and LGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy (18 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (1.3k citations), Clinical Psychology (2.3k citations) and Applied Psychology (523 citations). Richard de Visser has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include Anthony M. A. Smith, Juliet Richters, Chris Rissel, Andrew E. Grulich, Jonathan A. Smith, Elizabeth McDonnell, Judy M. Simpson, Dominic Conroy, Paul B. Badcock and Susan Ayers. Their work appears in journals such as The Lancet, Social Science & Medicine and Health Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.