Kim Dent‐Brown
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Conservation top 0.5%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health
- Co-authors
- Glenys ParryJohn BrazierElizabeth Taylor BuckIndra TumurSuzy PaisleyMichael FerriterRachel RuddyMichael Barkham
- Topics
- Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (9 papers)Art Therapy and Mental Health (8 papers)Psychiatric care and mental health services (4 papers)
- Journals
- Cochrane Database of Systematic ReviewsThe British Journal of PsychiatryBehaviour Research and Therapy
- Partner nations
- United KingdomPortugalQatar
In The Last Decade
Kim Dent‐Brown
26 papers receiving 481 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 84
- Clinical Psychology 279
- Social Psychology 179
- Conservation 131
- General Health Professions 95
- Psychiatry and Mental health 79
Countries citing papers authored by Kim Dent‐Brown
This map shows the geographic impact of Kim Dent‐Brown's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kim Dent‐Brown with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kim Dent‐Brown more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kim Dent‐Brown
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kim Dent‐Brown. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kim Dent‐Brown. The network helps show where Kim Dent‐Brown may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kim Dent‐Brown
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kim Dent‐Brown. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kim Dent‐Brown based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kim Dent‐Brown. Kim Dent‐Brown is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 37 | |
| 2 | 83 | |
| 3 | 28 | |
| 4 | 10 | |
| 5 | 12 | |
| 6 | 51 | |
| 7 | 14 | |
| 8 | 10 | |
| 9 | 26 | |
| 10 | An evaluation of a new service model: Improving Access to Psychological Therapies demonstration sites 2006-2009, Final Report. | 17 |
| 11 | An evaluation of six Community Mental Health Pilots for Veterans of the Armed Forces | 7 |
| 12 | Psychosocial stress in immigrants and in members of minority groups as a factor of terrorist behavior | 6 |
| 13 | 17 | |
| 14 | 27 | |
| 15 | 112 | |
| 16 | 12 | |
| 17 | 8 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 8 | |
| 20 | 6 |
About Kim Dent‐Brown
Kim Dent‐Brown is a scholar working on Conservation, Clinical Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 515 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (9 papers), Art Therapy and Mental Health (8 papers) and Psychiatric care and mental health services (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Conservation (131 citations), Clinical Psychology (279 citations) and Social Psychology (179 citations). Kim Dent‐Brown has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Portugal and Qatar. Frequent co-authors include Glenys Parry, John Brazier, Elizabeth Taylor Buck, Indra Tumur, Suzy Paisley, Michael Ferriter, Rachel Ruddy, Michael Barkham, Janice Connell and Gillian E. Hardy. Their work appears in journals such as Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, The British Journal of Psychiatry and Behaviour Research and Therapy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.