Kim Dent‐Brown

782 total citations
27 papers, 515 citations indexed

About

Kim Dent‐Brown is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Conservation and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Kim Dent‐Brown has authored 27 papers receiving a total of 515 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Clinical Psychology, 8 papers in Conservation and 7 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Kim Dent‐Brown's work include Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (9 papers), Art Therapy and Mental Health (8 papers) and Psychiatric care and mental health services (4 papers). Kim Dent‐Brown is often cited by papers focused on Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (9 papers), Art Therapy and Mental Health (8 papers) and Psychiatric care and mental health services (4 papers). Kim Dent‐Brown collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Portugal and Qatar. Kim Dent‐Brown's co-authors include Glenys Parry, John Brazier, Elizabeth Taylor Buck, Indra Tumur, Suzy Paisley, Michael Ferriter, Rachel Ruddy, Michael Barkham, Janice Connell and Gillian E. Hardy and has published in prestigious journals such as Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, The British Journal of Psychiatry and Behaviour Research and Therapy.

In The Last Decade

Kim Dent‐Brown

26 papers receiving 481 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Kim Dent‐Brown United Kingdom 12 279 179 131 95 79 27 515
Tony Soteriou United Kingdom 9 107 0.4× 150 0.8× 172 1.3× 121 1.3× 112 1.4× 15 456
Felix Gradinger United Kingdom 14 105 0.4× 48 0.3× 51 0.4× 343 3.6× 108 1.4× 30 614
Stuart McClean United Kingdom 12 72 0.3× 130 0.7× 45 0.3× 115 1.2× 53 0.7× 37 445
Clare O’Callaghan Australia 17 179 0.6× 271 1.5× 68 0.5× 130 1.4× 43 0.5× 62 698
Stephanie Schuette United States 12 187 0.7× 179 1.0× 10 0.1× 71 0.7× 66 0.8× 20 502
Evelyn Finnema Netherlands 12 112 0.4× 34 0.2× 12 0.1× 319 3.4× 278 3.5× 50 585
Angela Beattie United Kingdom 10 99 0.4× 87 0.5× 6 0.0× 205 2.2× 143 1.8× 18 552
Jennifer Abbey United States 5 367 1.3× 97 0.5× 8 0.1× 125 1.3× 66 0.8× 7 867
Tom Ricketts United Kingdom 16 276 1.0× 83 0.5× 3 0.0× 127 1.3× 94 1.2× 35 472
Ann‐Britt Ivarsson Sweden 12 138 0.5× 53 0.3× 14 0.1× 115 1.2× 131 1.7× 34 365

Countries citing papers authored by Kim Dent‐Brown

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kim Dent‐Brown's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kim Dent‐Brown with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kim Dent‐Brown more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kim Dent‐Brown

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kim Dent‐Brown. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kim Dent‐Brown. The network helps show where Kim Dent‐Brown may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kim Dent‐Brown

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kim Dent‐Brown. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kim Dent‐Brown based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kim Dent‐Brown. Kim Dent‐Brown is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hardy, Gillian E., Eleni Chambers, Janice Connell, et al.. (2017). Risk factors for negative experiences during psychotherapy. Psychotherapy Research. 29(3). 403–414. 37 indexed citations
2.
Uttley, Lesley, Alison Scope, Matt Stevenson, et al.. (2015). Systematic review and economic modelling of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of art therapy among people with non-psychotic mental health disorders. Health Technology Assessment. 19(18). 1–120. 83 indexed citations
3.
Saxon, D. H., et al.. (2014). Predictors of patient non-attendance at Improving Access to Psychological Therapy services demonstration sites. Journal of Affective Disorders. 169. 157–164. 28 indexed citations
4.
Buck, Elizabeth Taylor, Kim Dent‐Brown, Glenys Parry, & Jonathan Boote. (2014). Dyadic art psychotherapy: Key principles, practices and competences. The Arts in Psychotherapy. 41(2). 163–173. 10 indexed citations
6.
Mukuria, Clara, John Brazier, Michael Barkham, et al.. (2013). Cost-effectiveness of an Improving Access to Psychological Therapies service. The British Journal of Psychiatry. 202(3). 220–227. 51 indexed citations
7.
Buck, Elizabeth Taylor, Kim Dent‐Brown, & Glenys Parry. (2012). Exploring a dyadic approach to art psychotherapy with children and young people: A survey of British art psychotherapists. International Journal of Art Therapy. 18(1). 20–28. 14 indexed citations
9.
Lusignan, Simon de, Tom Chan, Glenn Parry, Kim Dent‐Brown, & Tony Kendrick. (2011). Referral to a new psychological therapy service is associated with reduced utilisation of healthcare and sickness absence by people with common mental health problems: a before and after comparison. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health. 66(6). e10–e10. 26 indexed citations
10.
Parry, Glenn, Michael Barkham, John Brazier, et al.. (2011). An evaluation of a new service model: Improving Access to Psychological Therapies demonstration sites 2006-2009, Final Report.. White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York). 17 indexed citations
11.
Dent‐Brown, Kim, Michael Barkham, Janice Connell, et al.. (2010). An evaluation of six Community Mental Health Pilots for Veterans of the Armed Forces. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester). 7 indexed citations
12.
Dent‐Brown, Kim, et al.. (2008). Psychosocial stress in immigrants and in members of minority groups as a factor of terrorist behavior. IOS Press eBooks. 6 indexed citations
13.
Kerr, Ian B., Kim Dent‐Brown, & Glenys Parry. (2007). Psychotherapy and mental health teams. International Review of Psychiatry. 19(1). 63–80. 17 indexed citations
14.
Ruddy, Rachel & Kim Dent‐Brown. (2007). Drama therapy for schizophrenia or schizophrenia-like illnesses. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2010(1). 27 indexed citations
15.
Brazier, John, Indra Tumur, Michael Ferriter, et al.. (2006). Psychological therapies including dialectical behaviour therapy for borderline personality disorder: a systematic review and preliminary economic evaluation. Health Technology Assessment. 10(35). iii, ix–xii, 1. 112 indexed citations
16.
Dent‐Brown, Kim, et al.. (2006). The mechanism of storymaking: A Grounded Theory study of the 6-Part Story Method. The Arts in Psychotherapy. 33(4). 316–330. 12 indexed citations
17.
Dent‐Brown, Kim, et al.. (2004). Developing a rating scale for projected stories. Psychology and Psychotherapy Theory Research and Practice. 77(3). 325–333. 8 indexed citations
18.
Dent‐Brown, Kim. (2001). The Chance of a Lifetime - a Dramatherapist Visits the Middle East. Dramatherapy. 23(2). 26–29. 1 indexed citations
19.
Dent‐Brown, Kim. (1999). The Six Part Story Method (6Psm). Dramatherapy. 21(2). 10–14. 8 indexed citations
20.
Dent‐Brown, Kim. (1993). Child sexual abuse: Problems for adult survivors. Journal of Mental Health. 2(4). 329–338. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026