Janice Connell

7.7k total citations · 1 hit paper
59 papers, 5.1k citations indexed

About

Janice Connell is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Janice Connell has authored 59 papers receiving a total of 5.1k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 26 papers in Clinical Psychology, 23 papers in General Health Professions and 15 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Janice Connell's work include Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (13 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (11 papers) and Mental Health Treatment and Access (11 papers). Janice Connell is often cited by papers focused on Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (13 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (11 papers) and Mental Health Treatment and Access (11 papers). Janice Connell collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Janice Connell's co-authors include Michael Barkham, John Mellor‐Clark, Chris Evans, Frank Margison, Kerry Audin, Graeme McGrath, John Brazier, William B. Stiles, Alicia O’Cathain and Elspeth Twigg and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology and Social Science & Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Janice Connell

59 papers receiving 4.8k citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Towards a standardised brief outcome measure: Psychometric properties and utility of the CORE–OM

2002 700 citations Chris Evans, Janice Connell et al. The British Journal of Psychiatry profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Janice Connell United Kingdom	31	2.9k	1.6k	1.3k	850	718	59	5.1k
Janhavi Ajit Vaingankar Singapore	42	2.4k 0.8×	1.7k 1.1×	1.4k 1.1×	1.1k 1.3×	657 0.9×	251	5.9k
Darcy A. Santor Canada	35	2.0k 0.7×	976 0.6×	907 0.7×	509 0.6×	966 1.3×	84	4.5k
Edimansyah Abdin Singapore	41	2.5k 0.9×	1.9k 1.2×	1.4k 1.1×	1.5k 1.8×	624 0.9×	297	6.2k
Markus Zenger Germany	34	1.9k 0.6×	828 0.5×	875 0.7×	514 0.6×	598 0.8×	123	4.2k
Mao‐Sheng Ran China	33	2.9k 1.0×	1.5k 1.0×	714 0.6×	1.2k 1.4×	344 0.5×	134	4.1k
Richard Byng United Kingdom	33	1.6k 0.5×	796 0.5×	1.6k 1.3×	486 0.6×	797 1.1×	144	4.3k
Andrea Fiorillo Italy	44	5.1k 1.7×	2.0k 1.3×	1.3k 1.0×	2.5k 2.9×	737 1.0×	279	7.6k
Lee Phan Canada	15	2.8k 1.0×	908 0.6×	656 0.5×	316 0.4×	694 1.0×	46	4.2k
Benjamin P. Chapman United States	38	2.0k 0.7×	1.0k 0.6×	634 0.5×	572 0.7×	1.0k 1.5×	132	4.7k
Christopher Langston United States	17	1.2k 0.4×	2.4k 1.5×	987 0.8×	690 0.8×	594 0.8×	26	4.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Janice Connell

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Janice Connell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janice Connell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janice Connell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Janice Connell

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janice Connell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janice Connell. The network helps show where Janice Connell may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Janice Connell

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Janice Connell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Janice Connell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Janice Connell. Janice Connell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Faija, Cintia, Janice Connell, Judith Gellatly, et al.. (2023). Enhancing the quality of psychological interventions delivered by telephone in mental health services: increasing the likelihood of successful implementation using a theory of change. BMC Psychiatry. 23(1). 405–405. 1 indexed citations

Wood, Emily, et al.. (2021). Social prescribing for people with complex needs: a realist evaluation. BMC Family Practice. 22(1). 53–53. 25 indexed citations

O’Cathain, Alicia, Emma Knowles, Janice Connell, et al.. (2020). Drivers of ‘clinically unnecessary’ use of emergency and urgent care: the DEUCE mixed-methods study. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 8(15). 1–256. 12 indexed citations

Carlton, Jill, Janice Connell, Tessa Peasgood, et al.. (2020). E-QALY: face validity testing the items for a new generic preference-based measure. Own your potential (DEAKIN). 1 indexed citations

Faija, Cintia, Janice Connell, Judith Gellatly, et al.. (2020). What influences practitioners’ readiness to deliver psychological interventions by telephone? A qualitative study of behaviour change using the Theoretical Domains Framework. BMC Psychiatry. 20(1). 371–371. 18 indexed citations

Grundy, Andrew, Anju Keetharuth, Rosemary Barber, et al.. (2019). Public involvement in health outcomes research: lessons learnt from the development of the recovering quality of life (ReQoL) measures. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 17(1). 60–60. 25 indexed citations

O’Cathain, Alicia, et al.. (2019). ‘Clinically unnecessary’ use of emergency and urgent care: A realist review of patients' decision making. Health Expectations. 23(1). 19–40. 60 indexed citations

Mukuria, Clara, Janice Connell, Jill Carlton, et al.. (2018). Developing Content for a New Generic Qaly Measure: Results from a Qualitative Literature Review (E-Qaly Project). Value in Health. 21. S110–S110. 7 indexed citations

Connell, Janice, Jill Carlton, Andrew Grundy, et al.. (2018). The importance of content and face validity in instrument development: lessons learnt from service users when developing the Recovering Quality of Life measure (ReQoL). Quality of Life Research. 27(7). 1893–1902. 181 indexed citations

10.

Saxon, D. H., Janice Connell, Phillippa Harrison, et al.. (2017). A pragmatic randomised controlled trial assessing the non-inferiority of counselling for depression versus cognitive-behaviour therapy for patients in primary care meeting a diagnosis of moderate or severe depression (PRaCTICED): Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 18(1). 93–93. 11 indexed citations

11.

Brazier, John, Anju Keetharuth, Janice Connell, et al.. (2016). Constructing Classification System For A New Qaly Measure In Mental Health: Recovering Quality Of Life (Reqol). Value in Health. 19(3). A190–A190. 3 indexed citations

12.

Brazier, John, Janice Connell, & Alicia O’Cathain. (2014). DO EQ-5D AND SF-6D ask the right questions in mental health? a content validation using interviews with patients. Value in Health. 17(3). A194–A194. 3 indexed citations

13.

Brazier, John, Janice Connell, Diana Papaioannou, et al.. (2014). A systematic review, psychometric analysis and qualitative assessment of generic preference-based measures of health in mental health populations and the estimation of mapping functions from widely used specific measures. Health Technology Assessment. 18(34). vii–viii, xiii. 213 indexed citations

14.

Barkham, Michael, Bridgette M. Bewick, Tracy Mullin, et al.. (2012). The CORE‐10: A short measure of psychological distress for routine use in the psychological therapies. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research. 13(1). 3–13. 251 indexed citations

15.

Parry, Glenn, Michael Barkham, John Brazier, et al.. (2011). An evaluation of a new service model: Improving Access to Psychological Therapies demonstration sites 2006-2009, Final Report.. White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York). 17 indexed citations

16.

Connell, Janice. (2009). The Global Aspects of Brain-Based Learning.. Educational Horizons. 88(1). 28–39. 28 indexed citations

17.

Cahill, Jack, Michael Barkham, Gillian E. Hardy, et al.. (2008). A review and critical appraisal of measures of therapist-patient interactions in mental health settings. Health Technology Assessment. 12(24). iii, ix–47. 46 indexed citations

18.

Stiles, William B., Michael Barkham, John Mellor‐Clark, & Janice Connell. (2007). Effectiveness of cognitive-behavioural, person-centred, and psychodynamic therapies in UK primary-care routine practice: replication in a larger sample. Psychological Medicine. 38(5). 677–688. 194 indexed citations

19.

Barkham, Michael, et al.. (2005). Suitability and utility of the CORE–OM and CORE–A for assessing severity of presenting problems in psychological therapy services based in primary and secondary care settings. The British Journal of Psychiatry. 186(3). 239–246. 166 indexed citations

20.

Margison, Frank, Michael Barkham, Chris Evans, et al.. (2000). Measurement and psychotherapy. The British Journal of Psychiatry. 177(2). 123–130. 215 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact