Indra Tumur

1.0k citations
11 papers · 812 indexed · h-index 11

Indra Tumur

11 papers receiving 777 citations

Peers

Indra Tumur
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
  • Applied Psychology 147
  • Clinical Psychology 185
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 101
  • Economics and Econometrics 178
  • Surgery 245
Replace Michelle K. White with:
Michelle K. White United States
Dorothea Niehoff Germany
Qiuying Han China
Stefan N. Symeonides United Kingdom
Jamie M. Stagl United States
Rute Vieira United Kingdom
Dounya Schoormans Netherlands
Thomas M. Atkinson United States
Betty Tai United States
Kathrine C. Fernandez United States
Indra Tumur relative to Michelle K. White United States Michelle K. White's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.3×
Michelle K. White · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Indra Tumur

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Indra Tumur's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Indra Tumur with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Indra Tumur more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Indra Tumur

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Indra Tumur. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Indra Tumur. The network helps show where Indra Tumur may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Indra Tumur, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Indra Tumur Line = papers co-authored together Indra Tumur links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
#Work
1 201219
2 201021
3 200853
4 200820
5 200815
6 2008162
7 200864
8 200742
9 2006112
10 2006282
11
Technology assessment report commissioned by the HTA Programme on behalf of The National Institute for Clinical Excellence The use of irinotecan, oxaliplatin and raltitrexed for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: systematic review and economic evaluation (review of Guidance No. 33) Addendum: Economic evaluation of irinotecan and oxaliplatin for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer
200522

About Indra Tumur

Indra Tumur is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Cancer Research, having authored 11 papers that have together received 812 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health (4 papers), Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (3 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers), Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life (2 papers), Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies (2 papers), Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes (2 papers), Personality Disorders and Psychopathology (2 papers) and Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (147 citations), Clinical Psychology (185 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (101 citations). Indra Tumur has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Michael Ferriter, Glenys Parry, Suzy Paisley, John Brazier, Paul Sutcliffe, Catherine Beverley, Eva Kaltenthaler, Roberta Ara, Alejandra Duenas and J. Chilcott. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Internal Medicine, Health Technology Assessment and Clinical Therapeutics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026