Indra Tumur
- Surgery
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Michael FerriterGlenys ParrySuzy PaisleyJohn BrazierPaul SutcliffeCatherine BeverleyEva KaltenthalerRoberta Ara
- Topics
- Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health (4 papers)Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (3 papers)Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Indra Tumur
11 papers receiving 777 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 100
- Surgery 245
- Clinical Psychology 185
- Economics and Econometrics 178
- Applied Psychology 147
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 101
Countries citing papers authored by Indra Tumur
This map shows the geographic impact of Indra Tumur's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Indra Tumur with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Indra Tumur more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Indra Tumur
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Indra Tumur. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Indra Tumur. The network helps show where Indra Tumur may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Indra Tumur
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Indra Tumur. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Indra Tumur based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Indra Tumur. Indra Tumur is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 19 | |
| 2 | 21 | |
| 3 | 53 | |
| 4 | 20 | |
| 5 | 15 | |
| 6 | 162 | |
| 7 | 64 | |
| 8 | 42 | |
| 9 | 112 | |
| 10 | 282 | |
| 11 | Technology assessment report commissioned by the HTA Programme on behalf of The National Institute for Clinical Excellence The use of irinotecan, oxaliplatin and raltitrexed for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer: systematic review and economic evaluation (review of Guidance No. 33) Addendum: Economic evaluation of irinotecan and oxaliplatin for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer | 22 |
About Indra Tumur
Indra Tumur is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Cancer Research, having authored 11 papers that have together received 812 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health (4 papers), Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy (3 papers) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (147 citations), Clinical Psychology (185 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (101 citations). Indra Tumur has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Michael Ferriter, Glenys Parry, Suzy Paisley, John Brazier, Paul Sutcliffe, Catherine Beverley, Eva Kaltenthaler, Roberta Ara, Alejandra Duenas and J. Chilcott. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Internal Medicine, Health Technology Assessment and Clinical Therapeutics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.