Gail Crombie

937 total citations
22 papers, 661 citations indexed

About

Gail Crombie is a scholar working on Education, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Gender Studies. According to data from OpenAlex, Gail Crombie has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 661 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Education, 10 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 8 papers in Gender Studies. Recurrent topics in Gail Crombie's work include Early Childhood Education and Development (8 papers), Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (7 papers) and Gender and Technology in Education (6 papers). Gail Crombie is often cited by papers focused on Early Childhood Education and Development (8 papers), Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (7 papers) and Gender and Technology in Education (6 papers). Gail Crombie collaborates with scholars based in Canada and United States. Gail Crombie's co-authors include Barbara M. Byrne, Patrick Ian Armstrong, Naida Silverthorn, Alison Jones, Sandra W. Pyke, Sergio Piccinin, Anne Trinneer, Barry H. Schneider, David L. DuBois and Jane E. Ledingham and has published in prestigious journals such as Child Development, Journal of Educational Psychology and Journal of Vocational Behavior.

In The Last Decade

Gail Crombie

22 papers receiving 572 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Gail Crombie Canada	12	324	196	186	158	123	22	661
Martha Bleeker United States	11	532 1.6×	124 0.6×	227 1.2×	211 1.3×	83 0.7×	19	831
Aimee L. Belanger United States	6	156 0.5×	168 0.9×	131 0.7×	238 1.5×	154 1.3×	6	579
Karyn L. Lewis United States	9	216 0.7×	164 0.8×	177 1.0×	268 1.7×	101 0.8×	13	657
Sophia Catsambis United States	12	787 2.4×	111 0.6×	190 1.0×	214 1.4×	59 0.5×	21	1.0k
Karen D. Arnold United States	12	340 1.0×	181 0.9×	113 0.6×	120 0.8×	48 0.4×	47	650
Eric D. Deemer United States	15	203 0.6×	277 1.4×	201 1.1×	258 1.6×	84 0.7×	40	708
Tierra M. Freeman United States	2	430 1.3×	248 1.3×	107 0.6×	155 1.0×	24 0.2×	2	700
Jessica Heppen United States	13	231 0.7×	155 0.8×	94 0.5×	48 0.3×	77 0.6×	32	598
Jane McEldowney Jensen United States	6	469 1.4×	235 1.2×	87 0.5×	186 1.2×	28 0.2×	12	763
Alexandra M. Araújo Portugal	16	332 1.0×	168 0.9×	107 0.6×	76 0.5×	47 0.4×	78	689

Countries citing papers authored by Gail Crombie

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Gail Crombie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Gail Crombie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gail Crombie more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Gail Crombie

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Gail Crombie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Gail Crombie. The network helps show where Gail Crombie may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Gail Crombie

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Gail Crombie. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Gail Crombie based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Gail Crombie. Gail Crombie is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Crombie, Gail, et al.. (2005). Predictors of Young Adolescents? Math Grades and Course Enrollment Intentions: Gender Similarities and Differences. Sex Roles. 52(5-6). 351–367. 66 indexed citations

2.

Silverthorn, Naida, David L. DuBois, & Gail Crombie. (2005). Self-Perceptions of Ability and Achievement Across the High School Transition: Investigation of a State—Trait Model. The Journal of Experimental Education. 73(3). 191–218. 15 indexed citations

3.

Crombie, Gail, John P. Walsh, & Anne Trinneer. (2003). Positive Effects of Science and Technology Summer Camps on Confidence, Values and Future Intentions. Canadian Journal of Counselling and Psychotherapy. 37(4). 256–269. 11 indexed citations

4.

Byrne, Barbara M. & Gail Crombie. (2003). Modeling and Testing Change: An Introduction to the Latent Growth Curve Model. 2(3). 177–203. 105 indexed citations

5.

Crombie, Gail, Sandra W. Pyke, Naida Silverthorn, Alison Jones, & Sergio Piccinin. (2003). Students' Perceptions of Their Classroom Participation and Instructor as a Function of Gender and Context. The Journal of Higher Education. 74(1). 51–76. 38 indexed citations

6.

Crombie, Gail, Sandra W. Pyke, Naida Silverthorn, Alison Jones, & Sergio Piccinin. (2003). Students' Perceptions of Their Classroom Participation and Instructor as a Function of Gender and Context. The Journal of Higher Education. 74(1). 51–76. 98 indexed citations

7.

Crombie, Gail, et al.. (2000). All-Female Computer Science.. The Science Teacher. 67(3). 40–43. 8 indexed citations

8.

Crombie, Gail, et al.. (2000). Bridging the Gender Gap in High-Technology Education. NASSP Bulletin. 84(618). 64–73. 11 indexed citations

9.

Armstrong, Patrick Ian & Gail Crombie. (2000). Compromises in Adolescents' Occupational Aspirations and Expectations from Grades 8 to 10. Journal of Vocational Behavior. 56(1). 82–98. 100 indexed citations

10.

Crombie, Gail & Patrick Ian Armstrong. (1999). Effects of Classroom Gender Composition on Adolescents' Computer-Related Attitudes and Future Intentions. Journal of Educational Computing Research. 20(4). 317–327. 22 indexed citations

11.

Crombie, Gail. (1999). Research on Young Women in Computer Science: Promoting High Technology for Girls.. 7 indexed citations

12.

Crombie, Gail, et al.. (1993). Masculinity and femininity in middle childhood: Developmental and factor analyses. Sex Roles. 28(3-4). 187–206. 10 indexed citations

13.

Crombie, Gail, Thérèse Bouffard‐Bouchard, & Barry H. Schneider. (1992). Gifted Programs: Gender Differences in Referral and Enrollment. Gifted Child Quarterly. 36(4). 213–214. 12 indexed citations

14.

Crombie, Gail, et al.. (1991). Children's Problem-Solving Performance: The Effects of Compliance and Cognitive Factors. The Journal of Genetic Psychology. 152(3). 359–369. 4 indexed citations

15.

Crombie, Gail & Dolores Gold. (1989). Compliance and Problem-Solving Competence in Girls and Boys. The Journal of Genetic Psychology. 150(3). 281–291. 13 indexed citations

16.

Schneider, Barry H., et al.. (1989). Social relations of gifted children as a function of age and school program.. Journal of Educational Psychology. 81(1). 48–56. 65 indexed citations

17.

Crombie, Gail. (1988). Gender Differences: Implications for Social Skills Assessment and Training. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology. 17(2). 116–120. 35 indexed citations

18.

Gold, Dolores, et al.. (1987). Relations between teachers' judgments of girls' and boys' compliance and intellectual competence. Sex Roles. 16(7-8). 351–358. 11 indexed citations

19.

Gold, Dolores, et al.. (1984). Sex Differences in Children's Performance in Problem-Solving Situations Involving an Adult Model. Child Development. 55(2). 543–543. 1 indexed citations

20.

Gold, Dolores, et al.. (1984). Sex Differences in Children's Performance in Problem-solving Situations Involving an Adult Model. Child Development. 55(2). 543–549. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact