Frederick G. Gmitter

10.2k total citations · 1 hit paper
239 papers, 6.3k citations indexed

About

Frederick G. Gmitter is a scholar working on Plant Science, Molecular Biology and Horticulture. According to data from OpenAlex, Frederick G. Gmitter has authored 239 papers receiving a total of 6.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 185 papers in Plant Science, 97 papers in Molecular Biology and 52 papers in Horticulture. Recurrent topics in Frederick G. Gmitter's work include Phytoplasmas and Hemiptera pathogens (77 papers), Cocoa and Sweet Potato Agronomy (52 papers) and Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (40 papers). Frederick G. Gmitter is often cited by papers focused on Phytoplasmas and Hemiptera pathogens (77 papers), Cocoa and Sweet Potato Agronomy (52 papers) and Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (40 papers). Frederick G. Gmitter collaborates with scholars based in United States, China and Spain. Frederick G. Gmitter's co-authors include Jude W. Grosser, Chunxian Chen, Qibin Yu, Shu Huang, Zhanao Deng, Gloria A. Moore, J. L. Chandler, Manuel Talón, Dongliang Du and Xulan Hu and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Physical Review Letters and Nature Communications.

In The Last Decade

Frederick G. Gmitter

231 papers receiving 6.0k citations

Hit Papers

Genomics of the origin an... 2018 2026 2020 2023 2018 100 200 300 400 500

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Frederick G. Gmitter United States 44 4.9k 2.9k 1.2k 768 549 239 6.3k
Fernando Nuez Spain 44 5.0k 1.0× 1.8k 0.6× 295 0.3× 410 0.5× 600 1.1× 222 6.1k
David N. Kuhn United States 30 1.9k 0.4× 1.5k 0.5× 801 0.7× 174 0.2× 95 0.2× 106 3.5k
Imre E. Somssich Germany 56 15.7k 3.2× 12.3k 4.3× 231 0.2× 777 1.0× 701 1.3× 90 18.7k
Doil Choi South Korea 47 6.5k 1.3× 2.9k 1.0× 82 0.1× 474 0.6× 303 0.6× 169 7.5k
Thomas Eulgem United States 29 7.6k 1.5× 5.3k 1.8× 102 0.1× 445 0.6× 361 0.7× 47 8.8k
Amir Sherman Israel 32 2.3k 0.5× 1.7k 0.6× 113 0.1× 605 0.8× 235 0.4× 71 3.3k
Anne Frary Türkiye 31 4.7k 0.9× 2.1k 0.7× 82 0.1× 308 0.4× 176 0.3× 98 5.7k
James J. Giovannoni United States 73 17.3k 3.5× 11.9k 4.1× 287 0.2× 450 0.6× 575 1.0× 175 20.7k
Shauna Somerville United States 56 12.4k 2.5× 5.4k 1.9× 94 0.1× 1.5k 2.0× 512 0.9× 103 14.2k
Mickaël Malnoy Italy 38 3.8k 0.8× 2.5k 0.9× 57 0.0× 788 1.0× 377 0.7× 127 4.8k

Countries citing papers authored by Frederick G. Gmitter

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Frederick G. Gmitter's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Frederick G. Gmitter with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Frederick G. Gmitter more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Frederick G. Gmitter

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Frederick G. Gmitter. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Frederick G. Gmitter. The network helps show where Frederick G. Gmitter may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Frederick G. Gmitter

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Frederick G. Gmitter. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Frederick G. Gmitter based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Frederick G. Gmitter. Frederick G. Gmitter is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Li, Jingwen, et al.. (2024). Identifying the earliest citrus responses to Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus infection: a temporal metabolomics study. Frontiers in Plant Science. 15. 1455344–1455344. 3 indexed citations
4.
Huo, Heqiang, et al.. (2022). Editing the CsDMR6 gene in citrus results in resistance to the bacterial disease citrus canker. Horticulture Research. 9. uhac082–uhac082. 21 indexed citations
5.
Wu, Bo, Qibin Yu, Zhanao Deng, et al.. (2022). A chromosome-level phased genome enabling allele-level studies in sweet orange: a case study on citrus Huanglongbing tolerance. Horticulture Research. 10(1). uhac247–uhac247. 18 indexed citations
6.
Wang, Zhixin, Frederick G. Gmitter, Jude W. Grosser, & Yu Wang. (2022). Natural Sweeteners and Sweetness-Enhancing Compounds Identified in Citrus Using an Efficient Metabolomics-Based Screening Strategy. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 70(34). 10593–10603. 19 indexed citations
7.
Gmitter, Frederick G., et al.. (2021). Water-Stress Influences on Three New Promising HLB-Tolerant Citrus Rootstocks. Horticulturae. 7(10). 336–336. 16 indexed citations
8.
Hijaz, Faraj, Frederick G. Gmitter, Jinhe Bai, et al.. (2020). Effect of fruit maturity on volatiles and sensory descriptors of four mandarin hybrids. Journal of Food Science. 85(5). 1548–1564. 32 indexed citations
9.
Killiny, Nabil, Shelley E. Jones, Faraj Hijaz, et al.. (2020). Metabolic Profiling of Hybrids Generated from Pummelo and Citrus latipes in Relation to Their Attraction to Diaphorina citri, the Vector of Huanglongbing. Metabolites. 10(12). 477–477. 2 indexed citations
10.
Huang, Linhua, Jude W. Grosser, Frederick G. Gmitter, Charles A. Sims, & Yu Wang. (2020). Effects of Scion/Rootstock Combination on Flavor Quality of Orange Juice from Huanglongbing (HLB)-Affected Trees: A Two-Year Study of the Targeted Metabolomics. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 68(10). 3286–3296. 14 indexed citations
12.
Shi, Feng, Joon Hyuk Suh, Frederick G. Gmitter, & Yu Wang. (2017). Differentiation between Flavors of Sweet Orange (Citrus sinensis) and Mandarin (Citrus reticulata). Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 66(1). 203–211. 75 indexed citations
13.
Chen, Chunxian, Frederick G. Gmitter, Qibin Yu, et al.. (2015). Cybridization of Grapefruit with ‘Dancy’ Mandarin Leads to Improved Fruit Characteristics. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science. 140(5). 427–435. 8 indexed citations
14.
Gmitter, Frederick G.. (2012). New Citrus Genome Sequence Resources. 2 indexed citations
15.
Chen, Chunxian, et al.. (2011). Characterization of Furanocoumarin Profile and Inheritance Toward Selection of Low Furanocoumarin Seedless Grapefruit Cultivars. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science. 136(5). 358–363. 16 indexed citations
16.
Plotto, Anne, et al.. (2010). Distribution of aroma volatile compounds in tangerine hybrids and proposed inheritance. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture. 91(3). 449–460. 64 indexed citations
17.
Rao, M. Nageswara, et al.. (2008). Genetic Diversity and Differentiation among Natural, Production, and Introduced Populations of the Narrowly Endemic Species Coreopsis leavenworthii (Asteraceae). Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science. 133(2). 234–241. 4 indexed citations
18.
Chen, Chunxian, et al.. (2008). Verification of Mandarin and Pummelo Somatic Hybrids by Expressed Sequence Tag–Simple Sequence Repeat Marker Analysis. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science. 133(6). 794–800. 11 indexed citations
19.
Gmitter, Frederick G., Zhanao Deng, & Gloria A. Moore. (1998). Utilization of DNA markers in citrus breeding programs. Fruits. 53(5). 303–306. 4 indexed citations
20.
Grosser, Jude W., et al.. (1992). Six New Somatic Citrus Hybrids and Their Potential for Cultivar Improvement. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science. 117(1). 169–173. 37 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026